CWE-1253: Incorrect Selection of Fuse Values
The logic used to determine system-security state for the product relies on values sensed from the fuses, but it relies on 'negative' logic for an un-blown fuse.
Fuses are often used to store secret data, including security configuration data. When not blown, a fuse is considered to store a logic 0, and, when blown, it indicates a logic 1. Fuses are generally considered to be one-directional, i.e., once blown to logic 1, it cannot be reset to logic 0. However, if the logic used to determine system-security state (by leveraging the values sensed from the fuses) uses negative logic, an attacker might blow the fuse and drive the system to an unsecure state.
The table(s) below shows the weaknesses and high level categories that are related to this weakness. These relationships are defined as ChildOf, ParentOf, MemberOf and give insight to similar items that may exist at higher and lower levels of abstraction. In addition, relationships such as PeerOf and CanAlsoBe are defined to show similar weaknesses that the user may want to explore.
Relevant to the view "Research Concepts" (CWE-1000)
Relevant to the view "Hardware Design" (CWE-1194)
The different Modes of Introduction provide information about how and when this weakness may be introduced. The Phase identifies a point in the life cycle at which introduction may occur, while the Note provides a typical scenario related to introduction during the given phase.
The listings below show possible areas for which the given weakness could appear. These may be for specific named Languages, Operating Systems, Architectures, Paradigms, Technologies, or a class of such platforms. The platform is listed along with how frequently the given weakness appears for that instance.
Class: Language-Independent (Undetermined Prevalence)
Class: OS-Independent (Undetermined Prevalence)
Class: Architecture-Independent (Undetermined Prevalence)
Class: System on Chip (Undetermined Prevalence)
The table below specifies different individual consequences associated with the weakness. The Scope identifies the application security area that is violated, while the Impact describes the negative technical impact that arises if an adversary succeeds in exploiting this weakness. The Likelihood provides information about how likely the specific consequence is expected to be seen relative to the other consequences in the list. For example, there may be high likelihood that a weakness will be exploited to achieve a certain impact, but a low likelihood that it will be exploited to achieve a different impact.
A chip implements secure boot and uses the sensed value of the fuse “do_secure_boot” to determine whether to perform secure boot or not. If this fuse value is “0”, the system performs secure boot. Otherwise, it does not perform secure boot. An attacker blows the "do_secure_boot" fuse to “1”. After reset, attacker loads custom bootloader, and, since the fuse value is now “1”, the system does not perform secure boot, and attacker can execute custom firmware image. Since the default, fuse-configuration value is 0, an attacker can blow it to 1 with inexpensive hardware. If the logic is reversed, then an attacker cannot reset the fuse. Note that, with specialized and expensive equipment, an attacker might be able to reset the fuse value to 0.
This entry is still under development and will continue to see updates and content improvements.
More information is available — Please select a different filter.