Description Summary The application attempts to return a memory resource to the
system, but it calls a release function that is not compatible with the function
that was originally used to allocate that resource.
Extended Description This weakness can be generally described as mismatching memory management routines, such as: 1. The memory was allocated on the stack (automatically), but it was deallocated using the memory management routine free() (CWE-590), which is intended for explicitly allocated heap memory. 2. The memory was allocated explicitly using one set of memory management functions, and deallocated using a different set. For example, memory might be allocated with malloc() in C++ instead of the new operator, and then deallocated with the delete operator. When the memory management functions are mismatched, the consequences may be as severe as code execution, memory corruption, or program crash. Consequences and ease of exploit will vary depending on the implementation of the routines and the object being managed. Example 1 This example allocates a BarObj object using the new operator in C++, however, the programmer then deallocates the object using free(), which may lead to unexpected behavior. (Bad Code) C++ void foo(){ BarObj *ptr = new BarObj()
/* do some work with ptr here */
...
free(ptr);
} Instead, the programmer should have either created the object with one of the malloc family functions, or else deleted the object with the delete operator. (Good Code) C++ void foo(){ BarObj *ptr = new BarObj()
/* do some work with ptr here */
...
delete ptr;
}
|
|
Page Last Updated:
October 29, 2009
|
|
CWE is a Software Assurance strategic initiative sponsored by the National Cyber Security Division of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. This Web site is hosted by The MITRE Corporation. Contact cwe@mitre.org for more information. |
|||
