|
Status: Draft Weakness ID: 153 (Weakness Variant)Description Summary Substitution symbols injected into an application through input can be used to compromise a system. As data is parsed, an injected symbol may cause the process to take unexpected actions. Potential Mitigations Developers should anticipate that substitution characters will be injected/removed/manipulated in the input vectors of their software system. Use an appropriate combination of black lists and white lists to ensure only valid, expected and appropriate input is processed by the system. Assume all input is malicious. Use a standard input validation mechanism to validate all input for length, type, syntax, and business rules before accepting the data to be diplayed or stored. Use an "accept known good" validation strategy. Use and specify a strong output encoding (such as ISO 8859-1 or UTF 8). Do not rely exclusively on blacklist validation to detect malicious input or to encode output. There are too many variants to encode a character; you're likely to miss some variants. Inputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application's current internal representation before being validated. Make sure that your application does not decode the same input twice. Such errors could be used to bypass whitelist schemes by introducing dangerous inputs after they have been checked. Observed Examples
Research Gaps Under-studied. Relationships
Taxonomy Mappings
Applicable Platforms Languages All Time of Introduction ImplementationContent History Submissions PLOVER. (Externally Mined) Modifications Eric Dalci. Cigital. 2008-07-01. (External) updated Potential_Mitigations, Time_of_Introduction CWE Content Team. MITRE. 2008-09-08. (Internal) updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings Previous Entry Names Substitution Character (changed 2008-01-30) Failure to Remove Substitution Character (changed 2008-04-11) |
|
|
|||