Example 1 This method is part of a singleton pattern, yet the following singleton() pattern is not thread-safe. It fails to ensure the creation of only one object. (Bad Code) Java private static NumberConverter singleton; public static NumberConverter get_singleton() { if (singleton == null) singleton = new
NumberConverter();
return singleton;
} Consider the following course of events: Thread A enters the method, finds singleton to be null, begins the NumberConverter constructor, and then is swapped out of execution. Thread B enters the method and finds that singleton remains null. This will happen if A was swapped out during the middle of the constructor, for the object reference is not set to point at the new object on the heap until the object is fully initialized. Thread B continues and constructs another NumberConverter object and returns it while exiting the method. Thread A continues, finishes constructing its NumberConverter object, and returns its version. It created and returned two different objects. Many programmers turned to the double-check pattern to avoid the overhead of a synchronized call, which is an extension of the one employed, until it too was shown to be not thread-safe.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Page Last Updated:
October 29, 2009
|
|
CWE is a Software Assurance strategic initiative sponsored by the National Cyber Security Division of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. This Web site is hosted by The MITRE Corporation. Contact cwe@mitre.org for more information. |
|||
