CWE-87: Improper Neutralization of Alternate XSS Syntax
Improper Neutralization of Alternate XSS Syntax
Weakness ID: 87 (Weakness Variant)
Status: Draft
Description
Description Summary
The software does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controlled input for alternate script syntax.
Time of Introduction
Implementation
Applicable Platforms
Languages
All
Common Consequences
Scope
Effect
Confidentiality
Integrity
Availability
Technical Impact: Read application
data; Execute unauthorized code or
commands
Demonstrative Examples
Example 1
In the following example, an XSS neutralization routine checks for
the lower-case "script" string but does not account for alternate strings
("SCRIPT", for example).
(Bad Code)
Example
Language: Java
public String preventXSS(String input, String mask) {
Resolve all input to absolute or canonical representations before
processing.
Carefully check each input parameter against a rigorous positive
specification (white list) defining the specific characters and format
allowed. All input should be neutralized, not just parameters that the
user is supposed to specify, but all data in the request, including tag
attributes, hidden fields, cookies, headers, the URL itself, and so
forth. A common mistake that leads to continuing XSS vulnerabilities is
to validate only fields that are expected to be redisplayed by the site.
We often encounter data from the request that is reflected by the
application server or the application that the development team did not
anticipate. Also, a field that is not currently reflected may be used by
a future developer. Therefore, validating ALL parts of the HTTP request
is recommended.
Phase: Implementation
Strategy: Output Encoding
For every web page that is generated, use and specify a character encoding such as ISO-8859-1 or UTF-8. When an encoding is not specified, the web browser may choose a different encoding by guessing which encoding is actually being used by the web page. This can cause the web browser to treat certain sequences as special, opening up the client to subtle XSS attacks. See CWE-116 for more mitigations related to encoding/escaping.
With Struts, you should write all data from form beans with the bean's
filter attribute set to true.
Phase: Implementation
Strategy: Identify and Reduce Attack Surface
To help mitigate XSS attacks against the user's session cookie, set
the session cookie to be HttpOnly. In browsers that support the HttpOnly
feature (such as more recent versions of Internet Explorer and Firefox),
this attribute can prevent the user's session cookie from being
accessible to malicious client-side scripts that use document.cookie.
This is not a complete solution, since HttpOnly is not supported by all
browsers. More importantly, XMLHTTPRequest and other powerful browser
technologies provide read access to HTTP headers, including the
Set-Cookie header in which the HttpOnly flag is set.