| CWE-341: Predictable from Observable State
 View customized information: For users who are interested in more notional aspects of a weakness. Example: educators, technical writers, and project/program managers.
	
	
		
        	For users who are concerned with the practical application and details about the nature of a weakness and how to prevent it from happening. Example: tool developers, security researchers, pen-testers, incident response analysts.
	
	
		
        	For users who are mapping an issue to CWE/CAPEC IDs, i.e., finding the most appropriate CWE for a specific issue (e.g., a CVE record).  Example: tool developers, security researchers.
	
	
			
        	For users who wish to see all available information for the CWE/CAPEC entry.
	
	
		
        	For users who want to customize what details are displayed. 
    ×
     Edit Custom FilterA number or object is predictable based on observations that the attacker can make about the state of the system or network, such as time, process ID, etc.  This table specifies different individual consequences
                        associated with the weakness. The Scope identifies the application security area that is
                        violated, while the Impact describes the negative technical impact that arises if an
                        adversary succeeds in exploiting this weakness. The Likelihood provides information about
                        how likely the specific consequence is expected to be seen relative to the other
                        consequences in the list. For example, there may be high likelihood that a weakness will be
                        exploited to achieve a certain impact, but a low likelihood that it will be exploited to
                        achieve a different impact. 
 
  This table shows the weaknesses and high level categories that are related to this
                            weakness. These relationships are defined as ChildOf, ParentOf, MemberOf and give insight to
                            similar items that may exist at higher and lower levels of abstraction. In addition,
                            relationships such as PeerOf and CanAlsoBe are defined to show similar weaknesses that the user
                            may want to explore.  Relevant to the view "Research Concepts" (View-1000) 
  Relevant to the view "Software Development" (View-699) 
  Relevant to the view "Architectural Concepts" (View-1008) 
  The different Modes of Introduction provide information
                        about how and when this
                        weakness may be introduced. The Phase identifies a point in the life cycle at which
                        introduction
                        may occur, while the Note provides a typical scenario related to introduction during the
                        given
                        phase. 
  This listing shows possible areas for which the given
                        weakness could appear. These
                        may be for specific named Languages, Operating Systems, Architectures, Paradigms,
                        Technologies,
                        or a class of such platforms. The platform is listed along with how frequently the given
                        weakness appears for that instance. 
 Example 1 This code generates a unique random identifier for a user's session. (bad code) 
                                    
                                    Example Language: PHP 
                                    
                                 function generateSessionID($userID){ srand($userID);} return rand(); Because the seed for the PRNG is always the user's ID, the session ID will always be the same. An attacker could thus predict any user's session ID and potentially hijack the session. This example also exhibits a Small Seed Space (CWE-339). Note: this is a curated list of examples for users to understand the variety of ways in which this weakness can be introduced. It is not a complete list of all CVEs that are related to this CWE entry. 
  This MemberOf Relationships table shows additional CWE Categories and Views that
                                reference this weakness as a member. This information is often useful in understanding where a
                                weakness fits within the context of external information sources. 
 
 Maintenance 
                                As of CWE 4.5, terminology related to randomness, entropy, and
	   predictability can vary widely. Within the developer and other
	   communities, "randomness" is used heavily. However, within
	   cryptography, "entropy" is distinct, typically implied as a
	   measurement. There are no commonly-used definitions, even within
	   standards documents and cryptography papers. Future versions of
	   CWE will attempt to define these terms and, if necessary,
	   distinguish between them in ways that are appropriate for
	   different communities but do not reduce the usability of CWE for
	   mapping, understanding, or other scenarios.
                             
 
 More information is available — Please edit the custom filter or select a different filter. | 
| Use of the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE™) and the associated references from this website are subject to the Terms of Use. CWE is sponsored by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) and managed by the Homeland Security Systems Engineering and Development Institute (HSSEDI) which is operated by The MITRE Corporation (MITRE). Copyright © 2006–2025, The MITRE Corporation. CWE, CWSS, CWRAF, and the CWE logo are trademarks of The MITRE Corporation. | ||
 
	                