Status: Draft Weakness ID: 416 (Weakness Base)Summary Referencing memory after it has been freed can cause a program to crash, use unexpected values, or execute code. Integrity The use of previously freed memory may corrupt valid data, if the memory area in question has been allocated and used properly elsewhere. Availability If chunk consolidation occur after the use of previously freed data, the process may crash when invalid data is used as chunk information. Access Control (instruction processing): If malicious data is entered before chunk consolidation can take place, it may be possible to take advantage of a write-what-where primitive to execute arbitrary code. Example 1: C Example: #include <stdio.h> #include <unistd.h> #define BUFSIZER1 512 #define BUFSIZER2 ((BUFSIZER1/2) - 8) int main(int argc, char **argv) { char *buf1R1; char *buf2R1; char *buf2R2; char *buf3R2; buf1R1 = (char *) malloc(BUFSIZER1); buf2R1 = (char *) malloc(BUFSIZER1); free(buf2R1); buf2R2 = (char *) malloc(BUFSIZER2); buf3R2 = (char *) malloc(BUFSIZER2); strncpy(buf2R1, argv[1], BUFSIZER1-1); free(buf1R1); free(buf2R2); free(buf3R2); } Example 2: The following code illustrates a use after free error: C Example: char* ptr = (char*)malloc (SIZE); ... if (err) { abrt = 1; free(ptr); } ... if (abrt) { logError("operation aborted before commit", ptr); }
Architecture and Design Choose a language that provides automatic memory management. Implementation Ensuring that all pointers are set to NULL once they memory they point to has been freed can be an effective strategy. The utilization of multiple or complex data structures may lower the usefulness of this strategy. Implementation Use a static analysis tool to find instances of use after free. The use of previously freed memory can have any number of adverse consequences -- ranging from the corruption of valid data to the execution of arbitrary code, depending on the instantiation and timing of the flaw. The simplest way data corruption may occur involves the system's reuse of the freed memory. Like double free errors and memory leaks, use after free errors have two common and sometimes overlapping causes: - Error conditions and other exceptional circumstances. - Confusion over which part of the program is responsible for freeing the memory. In this scenario, the memory in question is allocated to another pointer validly at some point after it has been freed. The original pointer to the freed memory is used again and points to somewhere within the new allocation. As the data is changed, it corrupts the validly used memory; this induces undefined behavior in the process. If the newly allocated data chances to hold a class, in C++ for example, various function pointers may be scattered within the heap data. If one of these function pointers is overwritten with an address to valid shellcode, execution of arbitrary code can be achieved.
A weakness where code path has: 1. start statement that relinquishes a dynamically allocated memory resource 2. end statement that accesses the dynamically allocated memory resource Submissions 7 Pernicious Kingdoms. (Externally Mined) Modifications Eric Dalci. Cigital. 2008-07-01. (External) updated Potential_Mitigations,
Time_of_Introduction KDM Analytics. 2008-08-01. (External) added/updated white box definitions CWE Content Team. MITRE. 2008-09-08. (Internal) updated Applicable_Platforms, Common_Consequences,
Relationships, Observed_Example, Other_Notes,
Taxonomy_Mappings CWE Content Team. MITRE. 2008-11-24. (Internal) updated Relationships,
Taxonomy_Mappings CWE Content Team. MITRE. 2009-03-10. (Internal) updated Demonstrative_Examples CWE Content Team. MITRE. 2009-05-27. (Internal) updated Demonstrative_Examples |
|
Page Last Updated:
May 26, 2009
|
|
CWE is a Software Assurance strategic initiative sponsored by the National Cyber Security Division of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. This Web site is hosted by The MITRE Corporation. Contact cwe@mitre.org for more information. |
|||
