CWE VIEW: Research Concepts
This view is intended to facilitate research into weaknesses, including their inter-dependencies, and can be leveraged to systematically identify theoretical gaps within CWE. It is mainly organized according to abstractions of behaviors instead of how they can be detected, where they appear in code, or when they are introduced in the development life cycle. By design, this view is expected to include every weakness within CWE.
The following graph shows the tree-like relationships between
weaknesses that exist at different levels of abstraction. At the highest level, categories
and pillars exist to group weaknesses. Categories (which are not technically weaknesses) are
special CWE entries used to group weaknesses that share a common characteristic. Pillars are
weaknesses that are described in the most abstract fashion. Below these top-level entries
are weaknesses are varying levels of abstraction. Classes are still very abstract, typically
independent of any specific language or technology. Base level weaknesses are used to
present a more specific type of weakness. A variant is a weakness that is described at a
very low level of detail, typically limited to a specific language or technology. A chain is
a set of weaknesses that must be reachable consecutively in order to produce an exploitable
vulnerability. While a composite is a set of weaknesses that must all be present
simultaneously in order to produce an exploitable vulnerability.
Show Details:
1000 - Research Concepts
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control)
The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.
Authorization
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
1191
(On-Chip Debug and Test Interface With Improper Access Control)
The chip does not implement or does not correctly perform access control to check whether users are authorized to access internal registers and test modes through the physical debug/test interface.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
1220
(Insufficient Granularity of Access Control)
The product implements access controls via a policy or other feature with the intention to disable or restrict accesses (reads and/or writes) to assets in a system from untrusted agents. However, implemented access controls lack required granularity, which renders the control policy too broad because it allows accesses from unauthorized agents to the security-sensitive assets.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
1220
(Insufficient Granularity of Access Control) >
1222
(Insufficient Granularity of Address Regions Protected by Register Locks)
The product defines a large address region protected from modification by the same register lock control bit. This results in a conflict between the functional requirement that some addresses need to be writable by software during operation and the security requirement that the system configuration lock bit must be set during the boot process.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
1224
(Improper Restriction of Write-Once Bit Fields)
The hardware design control register "sticky bits" or write-once bit fields are improperly implemented, such that they can be reprogrammed by software.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
1231
(Improper Prevention of Lock Bit Modification)
The product uses a trusted lock bit for restricting access to registers, address regions, or other resources, but the product does not prevent the value of the lock bit from being modified after it has been set.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
1233
(Security-Sensitive Hardware Controls with Missing Lock Bit Protection)
The product uses a register lock bit protection mechanism, but it does not ensure that the lock bit prevents modification of system registers or controls that perform changes to important hardware system configuration.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
1242
(Inclusion of Undocumented Features or Chicken Bits)
The device includes chicken bits or undocumented features that can create entry points for unauthorized actors.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
1252
(CPU Hardware Not Configured to Support Exclusivity of Write and Execute Operations)
The CPU is not configured to provide hardware support for exclusivity of write and execute operations on memory. This allows an attacker to execute data from all of memory.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
1257
(Improper Access Control Applied to Mirrored or Aliased Memory Regions)
Aliased or mirrored memory regions in hardware designs may have inconsistent read/write permissions enforced by the hardware. A possible result is that an untrusted agent is blocked from accessing a memory region but is not blocked from accessing the corresponding aliased memory region.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
1259
(Improper Restriction of Security Token Assignment)
The System-On-A-Chip (SoC) implements a Security Token mechanism to differentiate what actions are allowed or disallowed when a transaction originates from an entity. However, the Security Tokens are improperly protected.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
1260
(Improper Handling of Overlap Between Protected Memory Ranges)
The product allows address regions to overlap, which can result in the bypassing of intended memory protection.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
1262
(Improper Access Control for Register Interface)
The product uses memory-mapped I/O registers that act as an interface to hardware functionality from software, but there is improper access control to those registers.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
1263
(Improper Physical Access Control)
The product is designed with access restricted to certain information, but it does not sufficiently protect against an unauthorized actor with physical access to these areas.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
1263
(Improper Physical Access Control) >
1243
(Sensitive Non-Volatile Information Not Protected During Debug)
Access to security-sensitive information stored in fuses is not limited during debug.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
1267
(Policy Uses Obsolete Encoding)
The product uses an obsolete encoding mechanism to implement access controls.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
1268
(Policy Privileges are not Assigned Consistently Between Control and Data Agents)
The product's hardware-enforced access control for a particular resource improperly accounts for privilege discrepancies between control and write policies.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
1270
(Generation of Incorrect Security Tokens)
The product implements a Security Token mechanism to differentiate what actions are allowed or disallowed when a transaction originates from an entity. However, the Security Tokens generated in the system are incorrect.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
1274
(Improper Access Control for Volatile Memory Containing Boot Code)
The product conducts a secure-boot process that transfers bootloader code from Non-Volatile Memory (NVM) into Volatile Memory (VM), but it does not have sufficient access control or other protections for the Volatile Memory.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
1276
(Hardware Child Block Incorrectly Connected to Parent System)
Signals between a hardware IP and the parent system design are incorrectly connected causing security risks.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
1280
(Access Control Check Implemented After Asset is Accessed)
A product's hardware-based access control check occurs after the asset has been accessed.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
1283
(Mutable Attestation or Measurement Reporting Data)
The register contents used for attestation or measurement reporting data to verify boot flow are modifiable by an adversary.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
1290
(Incorrect Decoding of Security Identifiers )
The product implements a decoding mechanism to decode certain bus-transaction signals to security identifiers. If the decoding is implemented incorrectly, then untrusted agents can now gain unauthorized access to the asset.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
1292
(Incorrect Conversion of Security Identifiers)
The product implements a conversion mechanism to map certain bus-transaction signals to security identifiers. However, if the conversion is incorrectly implemented, untrusted agents can gain unauthorized access to the asset.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
1294
(Insecure Security Identifier Mechanism)
The System-on-Chip (SoC) implements a Security Identifier mechanism to differentiate what actions are allowed or disallowed when a transaction originates from an entity. However, the Security Identifiers are not correctly implemented.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
1294
(Insecure Security Identifier Mechanism) >
1302
(Missing Source Identifier in Entity Transactions on a System-On-Chip (SOC))
The product implements a security identifier mechanism to differentiate what actions are allowed or disallowed when a transaction originates from an entity. A transaction is sent without a security identifier.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
1296
(Incorrect Chaining or Granularity of Debug Components)
The product's debug components contain incorrect chaining or granularity of debug components.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
1304
(Improperly Preserved Integrity of Hardware Configuration State During a Power Save/Restore Operation)
The product performs a power save/restore
operation, but it does not ensure that the integrity of
the configuration state is maintained and/or verified between
the beginning and ending of the operation.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
1311
(Improper Translation of Security Attributes by Fabric Bridge)
The bridge incorrectly translates security attributes from either trusted to untrusted or from untrusted to trusted when converting from one fabric protocol to another.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
1312
(Missing Protection for Mirrored Regions in On-Chip Fabric Firewall)
The firewall in an on-chip fabric protects the main addressed region, but it does not protect any mirrored memory or memory-mapped-IO (MMIO) regions.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
1313
(Hardware Allows Activation of Test or Debug Logic at Runtime)
During runtime, the hardware allows for test or debug logic (feature) to be activated, which allows for changing the state of the hardware. This feature can alter the intended behavior of the system and allow for alteration and leakage of sensitive data by an adversary.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
1315
(Improper Setting of Bus Controlling Capability in Fabric End-point)
The bus controller enables bits in the fabric end-point to allow responder devices to control transactions on the fabric.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
1316
(Fabric-Address Map Allows Programming of Unwarranted Overlaps of Protected and Unprotected Ranges)
The address map of the on-chip fabric has protected and unprotected regions overlapping, allowing an attacker to bypass access control to the overlapping portion of the protected region.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
1317
(Improper Access Control in Fabric Bridge)
The product uses a fabric bridge for transactions between two Intellectual Property (IP) blocks, but the bridge does not properly perform the expected privilege, identity, or other access control checks between those IP blocks.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
1320
(Improper Protection for Outbound Error Messages and Alert Signals)
Untrusted agents can disable alerts about signal conditions exceeding limits or the response mechanism that handles such alerts.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
1323
(Improper Management of Sensitive Trace Data)
Trace data collected from several sources on the
System-on-Chip (SoC) is stored in unprotected locations or
transported to untrusted agents.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
1334
(Unauthorized Error Injection Can Degrade Hardware Redundancy)
An unauthorized agent can inject errors into a redundant block to deprive the system of redundancy or put the system in a degraded operating mode.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
269
(Improper Privilege Management)
The product does not properly assign, modify, track, or check privileges for an actor, creating an unintended sphere of control for that actor.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
269
(Improper Privilege Management) >
250
(Execution with Unnecessary Privileges)
The product performs an operation at a privilege level that is higher than the minimum level required, which creates new weaknesses or amplifies the consequences of other weaknesses.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
269
(Improper Privilege Management) >
266
(Incorrect Privilege Assignment)
A product incorrectly assigns a privilege to a particular actor, creating an unintended sphere of control for that actor.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
269
(Improper Privilege Management) >
266
(Incorrect Privilege Assignment) >
1022
(Use of Web Link to Untrusted Target with window.opener Access)
The web application produces links to untrusted external sites outside of its sphere of control, but it does not properly prevent the external site from modifying security-critical properties of the window.opener object, such as the location property.
tabnabbing
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
269
(Improper Privilege Management) >
266
(Incorrect Privilege Assignment) >
520
(.NET Misconfiguration: Use of Impersonation)
Allowing a .NET application to run at potentially escalated levels of access to the underlying operating and file systems can be dangerous and result in various forms of attacks.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
269
(Improper Privilege Management) >
266
(Incorrect Privilege Assignment) >
556
(ASP.NET Misconfiguration: Use of Identity Impersonation)
Configuring an ASP.NET application to run with impersonated credentials may give the application unnecessary privileges.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
269
(Improper Privilege Management) >
266
(Incorrect Privilege Assignment) >
9
(J2EE Misconfiguration: Weak Access Permissions for EJB Methods)
If elevated access rights are assigned to EJB methods, then an attacker can take advantage of the permissions to exploit the product.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
269
(Improper Privilege Management) >
267
(Privilege Defined With Unsafe Actions)
A particular privilege, role, capability, or right can be used to perform unsafe actions that were not intended, even when it is assigned to the correct entity.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
269
(Improper Privilege Management) >
267
(Privilege Defined With Unsafe Actions) >
623
(Unsafe ActiveX Control Marked Safe For Scripting)
An ActiveX control is intended for restricted use, but it has been marked as safe-for-scripting.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
269
(Improper Privilege Management) >
268
(Privilege Chaining)
Two distinct privileges, roles, capabilities, or rights can be combined in a way that allows an entity to perform unsafe actions that would not be allowed without that combination.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
269
(Improper Privilege Management) >
270
(Privilege Context Switching Error)
The product does not properly manage privileges while it is switching between different contexts that have different privileges or spheres of control.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
269
(Improper Privilege Management) >
271
(Privilege Dropping / Lowering Errors)
The product does not drop privileges before passing control of a resource to an actor that does not have those privileges.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
269
(Improper Privilege Management) >
271
(Privilege Dropping / Lowering Errors) >
272
(Least Privilege Violation)
The elevated privilege level required to perform operations such as chroot() should be dropped immediately after the operation is performed.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
269
(Improper Privilege Management) >
271
(Privilege Dropping / Lowering Errors) >
273
(Improper Check for Dropped Privileges)
The product attempts to drop privileges but does not check or incorrectly checks to see if the drop succeeded.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
269
(Improper Privilege Management) >
274
(Improper Handling of Insufficient Privileges)
The product does not handle or incorrectly handles when it has insufficient privileges to perform an operation, leading to resultant weaknesses.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
269
(Improper Privilege Management) >
648
(Incorrect Use of Privileged APIs)
The product does not conform to the API requirements for a function call that requires extra privileges. This could allow attackers to gain privileges by causing the function to be called incorrectly.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
282
(Improper Ownership Management)
The product assigns the wrong ownership, or does not properly verify the ownership, of an object or resource.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
282
(Improper Ownership Management) >
283
(Unverified Ownership)
The product does not properly verify that a critical resource is owned by the proper entity.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
282
(Improper Ownership Management) >
708
(Incorrect Ownership Assignment)
The product assigns an owner to a resource, but the owner is outside of the intended control sphere.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
285
(Improper Authorization)
The product does not perform or incorrectly performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.
AuthZ
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
285
(Improper Authorization) >
1230
(Exposure of Sensitive Information Through Metadata)
The product prevents direct access to a resource containing sensitive information, but it does not sufficiently limit access to metadata that is derived from the original, sensitive information.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
285
(Improper Authorization) >
1230
(Exposure of Sensitive Information Through Metadata) >
202
(Exposure of Sensitive Information Through Data Queries)
When trying to keep information confidential, an attacker can often infer some of the information by using statistics.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
285
(Improper Authorization) >
1230
(Exposure of Sensitive Information Through Metadata) >
612
(Improper Authorization of Index Containing Sensitive Information)
The product creates a search index of private or sensitive documents, but it does not properly limit index access to actors who are authorized to see the original information.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
285
(Improper Authorization) >
1256
(Improper Restriction of Software Interfaces to Hardware Features)
The product provides software-controllable
device functionality for capabilities such as power and
clock management, but it does not properly limit
functionality that can lead to modification of
hardware memory or register bits, or the ability to
observe physical side channels.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
285
(Improper Authorization) >
1297
(Unprotected Confidential Information on Device is Accessible by OSAT Vendors)
The product does not adequately protect confidential information on the device from being accessed by Outsourced Semiconductor Assembly and Test (OSAT) vendors.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
285
(Improper Authorization) >
1328
(Security Version Number Mutable to Older Versions)
Security-version number in hardware is mutable, resulting in the ability to downgrade (roll-back) the boot firmware to vulnerable code versions.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
285
(Improper Authorization) >
552
(Files or Directories Accessible to External Parties)
The product makes files or directories accessible to unauthorized actors, even though they should not be.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
285
(Improper Authorization) >
552
(Files or Directories Accessible to External Parties) >
219
(Storage of File with Sensitive Data Under Web Root)
The product stores sensitive data under the web document root with insufficient access control, which might make it accessible to untrusted parties.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
285
(Improper Authorization) >
552
(Files or Directories Accessible to External Parties) >
219
(Storage of File with Sensitive Data Under Web Root) >
433
(Unparsed Raw Web Content Delivery)
The product stores raw content or supporting code under the web document root with an extension that is not specifically handled by the server.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
285
(Improper Authorization) >
552
(Files or Directories Accessible to External Parties) >
220
(Storage of File With Sensitive Data Under FTP Root)
The product stores sensitive data under the FTP server root with insufficient access control, which might make it accessible to untrusted parties.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
285
(Improper Authorization) >
552
(Files or Directories Accessible to External Parties) >
527
(Exposure of Version-Control Repository to an Unauthorized Control Sphere)
The product stores a CVS, git, or other repository in a directory, archive, or other resource that is stored, transferred, or otherwise made accessible to unauthorized actors.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
285
(Improper Authorization) >
552
(Files or Directories Accessible to External Parties) >
528
(Exposure of Core Dump File to an Unauthorized Control Sphere)
The product generates a core dump file in a directory, archive, or other resource that is stored, transferred, or otherwise made accessible to unauthorized actors.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
285
(Improper Authorization) >
552
(Files or Directories Accessible to External Parties) >
529
(Exposure of Access Control List Files to an Unauthorized Control Sphere)
The product stores access control list files in a directory or other container that is accessible to actors outside of the intended control sphere.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
285
(Improper Authorization) >
552
(Files or Directories Accessible to External Parties) >
530
(Exposure of Backup File to an Unauthorized Control Sphere)
A backup file is stored in a directory or archive that is made accessible to unauthorized actors.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
285
(Improper Authorization) >
552
(Files or Directories Accessible to External Parties) >
539
(Use of Persistent Cookies Containing Sensitive Information)
The web application uses persistent cookies, but the cookies contain sensitive information.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
285
(Improper Authorization) >
552
(Files or Directories Accessible to External Parties) >
553
(Command Shell in Externally Accessible Directory)
A possible shell file exists in /cgi-bin/ or other accessible directories. This is extremely dangerous and can be used by an attacker to execute commands on the web server.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
285
(Improper Authorization) >
732
(Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource)
The product specifies permissions for a security-critical resource in a way that allows that resource to be read or modified by unintended actors.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
285
(Improper Authorization) >
732
(Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource) >
1004
(Sensitive Cookie Without 'HttpOnly' Flag)
The product uses a cookie to store sensitive information, but the cookie is not marked with the HttpOnly flag.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
285
(Improper Authorization) >
732
(Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource) >
276
(Incorrect Default Permissions)
During installation, installed file permissions are set to allow anyone to modify those files.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
285
(Improper Authorization) >
732
(Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource) >
277
(Insecure Inherited Permissions)
A product defines a set of insecure permissions that are inherited by objects that are created by the program.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
285
(Improper Authorization) >
732
(Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource) >
278
(Insecure Preserved Inherited Permissions)
A product inherits a set of insecure permissions for an object, e.g. when copying from an archive file, without user awareness or involvement.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
285
(Improper Authorization) >
732
(Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource) >
279
(Incorrect Execution-Assigned Permissions)
While it is executing, the product sets the permissions of an object in a way that violates the intended permissions that have been specified by the user.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
285
(Improper Authorization) >
732
(Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource) >
281
(Improper Preservation of Permissions)
The product does not preserve permissions or incorrectly preserves permissions when copying, restoring, or sharing objects, which can cause them to have less restrictive permissions than intended.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
285
(Improper Authorization) >
732
(Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource) >
766
(Critical Data Element Declared Public)
The product declares a critical variable, field, or member to be public when intended security policy requires it to be private.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
285
(Improper Authorization) >
862
(Missing Authorization)
The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.
AuthZ
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
285
(Improper Authorization) >
862
(Missing Authorization) >
1314
(Missing Write Protection for Parametric Data Values)
The device does not write-protect the parametric data values for sensors that scale the sensor value, allowing untrusted software to manipulate the apparent result and potentially damage hardware or cause operational failure.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
285
(Improper Authorization) >
862
(Missing Authorization) >
425
(Direct Request ('Forced Browsing'))
The web application does not adequately enforce appropriate authorization on all restricted URLs, scripts, or files.
forced browsing
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
285
(Improper Authorization) >
862
(Missing Authorization) >
638
(Not Using Complete Mediation)
The product does not perform access checks on a resource every time the resource is accessed by an entity, which can create resultant weaknesses if that entity's rights or privileges change over time.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
285
(Improper Authorization) >
862
(Missing Authorization) >
638
(Not Using Complete Mediation) >
424
(Improper Protection of Alternate Path)
The product does not sufficiently protect all possible paths that a user can take to access restricted functionality or resources.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
285
(Improper Authorization) >
862
(Missing Authorization) >
638
(Not Using Complete Mediation) >
424
(Improper Protection of Alternate Path) >
425
(Direct Request ('Forced Browsing'))
The web application does not adequately enforce appropriate authorization on all restricted URLs, scripts, or files.
forced browsing
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
285
(Improper Authorization) >
862
(Missing Authorization) >
939
(Improper Authorization in Handler for Custom URL Scheme)
The product uses a handler for a custom URL scheme, but it does not properly restrict which actors can invoke the handler using the scheme.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
285
(Improper Authorization) >
863
(Incorrect Authorization)
The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check.
AuthZ
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
285
(Improper Authorization) >
863
(Incorrect Authorization) >
1244
(Internal Asset Exposed to Unsafe Debug Access Level or State)
The product uses physical debug or test
interfaces with support for multiple access levels, but it
assigns the wrong debug access level to an internal asset,
providing unintended access to the asset from untrusted debug
agents.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
285
(Improper Authorization) >
863
(Incorrect Authorization) >
551
(Incorrect Behavior Order: Authorization Before Parsing and Canonicalization)
If a web server does not fully parse requested URLs before it examines them for authorization, it may be possible for an attacker to bypass authorization protection.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
285
(Improper Authorization) >
863
(Incorrect Authorization) >
639
(Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key)
The system's authorization functionality does not prevent one user from gaining access to another user's data or record by modifying the key value identifying the data.
Insecure Direct Object Reference / IDOR
Broken Object Level Authorization / BOLA
Horizontal Authorization
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
285
(Improper Authorization) >
863
(Incorrect Authorization) >
639
(Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key) >
566
(Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled SQL Primary Key)
The product uses a database table that includes records that should not be accessible to an actor, but it executes a SQL statement with a primary key that can be controlled by that actor.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
285
(Improper Authorization) >
863
(Incorrect Authorization) >
647
(Use of Non-Canonical URL Paths for Authorization Decisions)
The product defines policy namespaces and makes authorization decisions based on the assumption that a URL is canonical. This can allow a non-canonical URL to bypass the authorization.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
285
(Improper Authorization) >
863
(Incorrect Authorization) >
804
(Guessable CAPTCHA)
The product uses a CAPTCHA challenge, but the challenge can be guessed or automatically recognized by a non-human actor.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
285
(Improper Authorization) >
863
(Incorrect Authorization) >
942
(Permissive Cross-domain Policy with Untrusted Domains)
The product uses a cross-domain policy file that includes domains that should not be trusted.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
285
(Improper Authorization) >
926
(Improper Export of Android Application Components)
The Android application exports a component for use by other applications, but does not properly restrict which applications can launch the component or access the data it contains.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
285
(Improper Authorization) >
927
(Use of Implicit Intent for Sensitive Communication)
The Android application uses an implicit intent for transmitting sensitive data to other applications.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
286
(Incorrect User Management)
The product does not properly manage a user within its environment.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
286
(Incorrect User Management) >
842
(Placement of User into Incorrect Group)
The product or the administrator places a user into an incorrect group.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication)
When an actor claims to have a given identity, the product does not prove or insufficiently proves that the claim is correct.
authentification
AuthN
AuthC
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
1390
(Weak Authentication)
The product uses an authentication mechanism to restrict access to specific users or identities, but the mechanism does not sufficiently prove that the claimed identity is correct.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
1390
(Weak Authentication) >
1391
(Use of Weak Credentials)
The product uses weak credentials (such as a default key or hard-coded password) that can be calculated, derived, reused, or guessed by an attacker.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
1390
(Weak Authentication) >
1391
(Use of Weak Credentials) >
1392
(Use of Default Credentials)
The product uses default credentials (such as passwords or cryptographic keys) for potentially critical functionality.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
1390
(Weak Authentication) >
1391
(Use of Weak Credentials) >
1392
(Use of Default Credentials) >
1393
(Use of Default Password)
The product uses default passwords for potentially critical functionality.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
1390
(Weak Authentication) >
1391
(Use of Weak Credentials) >
1392
(Use of Default Credentials) >
1394
(Use of Default Cryptographic Key)
The product uses a default cryptographic key for potentially critical functionality.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
1390
(Weak Authentication) >
1391
(Use of Weak Credentials) >
521
(Weak Password Requirements)
The product does not require that users should have strong passwords, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
1390
(Weak Authentication) >
1391
(Use of Weak Credentials) >
521
(Weak Password Requirements) >
258
(Empty Password in Configuration File)
Using an empty string as a password is insecure.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
1390
(Weak Authentication) >
1391
(Use of Weak Credentials) >
798
(Use of Hard-coded Credentials)
The product contains hard-coded credentials, such as a password or cryptographic key.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
1390
(Weak Authentication) >
1391
(Use of Weak Credentials) >
798
(Use of Hard-coded Credentials) >
259
(Use of Hard-coded Password)
The product contains a hard-coded password, which it uses for its own inbound authentication or for outbound communication to external components.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
1390
(Weak Authentication) >
1391
(Use of Weak Credentials) >
798
(Use of Hard-coded Credentials) >
321
(Use of Hard-coded Cryptographic Key)
The use of a hard-coded cryptographic key significantly increases the possibility that encrypted data may be recovered.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
1390
(Weak Authentication) >
262
(Not Using Password Aging)
The product does not have a mechanism in place for managing password aging.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
1390
(Weak Authentication) >
263
(Password Aging with Long Expiration)
The product supports password aging, but the expiration period is too long.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
1390
(Weak Authentication) >
289
(Authentication Bypass by Alternate Name)
The product performs authentication based on the name of a resource being accessed, or the name of the actor performing the access, but it does not properly check all possible names for that resource or actor.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
1390
(Weak Authentication) >
290
(Authentication Bypass by Spoofing)
This attack-focused weakness is caused by incorrectly implemented authentication schemes that are subject to spoofing attacks.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
1390
(Weak Authentication) >
290
(Authentication Bypass by Spoofing) >
291
(Reliance on IP Address for Authentication)
The product uses an IP address for authentication.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
1390
(Weak Authentication) >
290
(Authentication Bypass by Spoofing) >
293
(Using Referer Field for Authentication)
The referer field in HTTP requests can be easily modified and, as such, is not a valid means of message integrity checking.
referrer
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
1390
(Weak Authentication) >
290
(Authentication Bypass by Spoofing) >
350
(Reliance on Reverse DNS Resolution for a Security-Critical Action)
The product performs reverse DNS resolution on an IP address to obtain the hostname and make a security decision, but it does not properly ensure that the IP address is truly associated with the hostname.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
1390
(Weak Authentication) >
294
(Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay)
A capture-replay flaw exists when the design of the product makes it possible for a malicious user to sniff network traffic and bypass authentication by replaying it to the server in question to the same effect as the original message (or with minor changes).
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
1390
(Weak Authentication) >
301
(Reflection Attack in an Authentication Protocol)
Simple authentication protocols are subject to reflection attacks if a malicious user can use the target machine to impersonate a trusted user.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
1390
(Weak Authentication) >
302
(Authentication Bypass by Assumed-Immutable Data)
The authentication scheme or implementation uses key data elements that are assumed to be immutable, but can be controlled or modified by the attacker.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
1390
(Weak Authentication) >
303
(Incorrect Implementation of Authentication Algorithm)
The requirements for the product dictate the use of an established authentication algorithm, but the implementation of the algorithm is incorrect.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
1390
(Weak Authentication) >
303
(Incorrect Implementation of Authentication Algorithm) >
304
(Missing Critical Step in Authentication)
The product implements an authentication technique, but it skips a step that weakens the technique.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
1390
(Weak Authentication) >
305
(Authentication Bypass by Primary Weakness)
The authentication algorithm is sound, but the implemented mechanism can be bypassed as the result of a separate weakness that is primary to the authentication error.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
1390
(Weak Authentication) >
307
(Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts)
The product does not implement sufficient measures to prevent multiple failed authentication attempts within a short time frame.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
1390
(Weak Authentication) >
308
(Use of Single-factor Authentication)
The use of single-factor authentication can lead to unnecessary risk of compromise when compared with the benefits of a dual-factor authentication scheme.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
1390
(Weak Authentication) >
309
(Use of Password System for Primary Authentication)
The use of password systems as the primary means of authentication may be subject to several flaws or shortcomings, each reducing the effectiveness of the mechanism.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
1390
(Weak Authentication) >
522
(Insufficiently Protected Credentials)
The product transmits or stores authentication credentials, but it uses an insecure method that is susceptible to unauthorized interception and/or retrieval.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
1390
(Weak Authentication) >
522
(Insufficiently Protected Credentials) >
256
(Plaintext Storage of a Password)
Storing a password in plaintext may result in a system compromise.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
1390
(Weak Authentication) >
522
(Insufficiently Protected Credentials) >
257
(Storing Passwords in a Recoverable Format)
The storage of passwords in a recoverable format makes them subject to password reuse attacks by malicious users. In fact, it should be noted that recoverable encrypted passwords provide no significant benefit over plaintext passwords since they are subject not only to reuse by malicious attackers but also by malicious insiders. If a system administrator can recover a password directly, or use a brute force search on the available information, the administrator can use the password on other accounts.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
1390
(Weak Authentication) >
522
(Insufficiently Protected Credentials) >
260
(Password in Configuration File)
The product stores a password in a configuration file that might be accessible to actors who do not know the password.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
1390
(Weak Authentication) >
522
(Insufficiently Protected Credentials) >
260
(Password in Configuration File) >
13
(ASP.NET Misconfiguration: Password in Configuration File)
Storing a plaintext password in a configuration file allows anyone who can read the file access to the password-protected resource making them an easy target for attackers.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
1390
(Weak Authentication) >
522
(Insufficiently Protected Credentials) >
260
(Password in Configuration File) >
258
(Empty Password in Configuration File)
Using an empty string as a password is insecure.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
1390
(Weak Authentication) >
522
(Insufficiently Protected Credentials) >
260
(Password in Configuration File) >
555
(J2EE Misconfiguration: Plaintext Password in Configuration File)
The J2EE application stores a plaintext password in a configuration file.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
1390
(Weak Authentication) >
522
(Insufficiently Protected Credentials) >
261
(Weak Encoding for Password)
Obscuring a password with a trivial encoding does not protect the password.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
1390
(Weak Authentication) >
522
(Insufficiently Protected Credentials) >
523
(Unprotected Transport of Credentials)
Login pages do not use adequate measures to protect the user name and password while they are in transit from the client to the server.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
1390
(Weak Authentication) >
522
(Insufficiently Protected Credentials) >
549
(Missing Password Field Masking)
The product does not mask passwords during entry, increasing the potential for attackers to observe and capture passwords.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
1390
(Weak Authentication) >
593
(Authentication Bypass: OpenSSL CTX Object Modified after SSL Objects are Created)
The product modifies the SSL context after connection creation has begun.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
1390
(Weak Authentication) >
603
(Use of Client-Side Authentication)
A client/server product performs authentication within client code but not in server code, allowing server-side authentication to be bypassed via a modified client that omits the authentication check.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
1390
(Weak Authentication) >
620
(Unverified Password Change)
When setting a new password for a user, the product does not require knowledge of the original password, or using another form of authentication.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
1390
(Weak Authentication) >
640
(Weak Password Recovery Mechanism for Forgotten Password)
The product contains a mechanism for users to recover or change their passwords without knowing the original password, but the mechanism is weak.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
1390
(Weak Authentication) >
804
(Guessable CAPTCHA)
The product uses a CAPTCHA challenge, but the challenge can be guessed or automatically recognized by a non-human actor.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
1390
(Weak Authentication) >
836
(Use of Password Hash Instead of Password for Authentication)
The product records password hashes in a data store, receives a hash of a password from a client, and compares the supplied hash to the hash obtained from the data store.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
295
(Improper Certificate Validation)
The product does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
295
(Improper Certificate Validation) >
296
(Improper Following of a Certificate's Chain of Trust)
The product does not follow, or incorrectly follows, the chain of trust for a certificate back to a trusted root certificate, resulting in incorrect trust of any resource that is associated with that certificate.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
295
(Improper Certificate Validation) >
297
(Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch)
The product communicates with a host that provides a certificate, but the product does not properly ensure that the certificate is actually associated with that host.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
295
(Improper Certificate Validation) >
298
(Improper Validation of Certificate Expiration)
A certificate expiration is not validated or is incorrectly validated, so trust may be assigned to certificates that have been abandoned due to age.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
295
(Improper Certificate Validation) >
299
(Improper Check for Certificate Revocation)
The product does not check or incorrectly checks the revocation status of a certificate, which may cause it to use a certificate that has been compromised.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
295
(Improper Certificate Validation) >
299
(Improper Check for Certificate Revocation) >
370
(Missing Check for Certificate Revocation after Initial Check)
The product does not check the revocation status of a certificate after its initial revocation check, which can cause the product to perform privileged actions even after the certificate is revoked at a later time.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
295
(Improper Certificate Validation) >
599
(Missing Validation of OpenSSL Certificate)
The product uses OpenSSL and trusts or uses a certificate without using the SSL_get_verify_result() function to ensure that the certificate satisfies all necessary security requirements.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
306
(Missing Authentication for Critical Function)
The product does not perform any authentication for functionality that requires a provable user identity or consumes a significant amount of resources.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
306
(Missing Authentication for Critical Function) >
288
(Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel)
The product requires authentication, but the product has an alternate path or channel that does not require authentication.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
306
(Missing Authentication for Critical Function) >
288
(Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel) >
1299
(Missing Protection Mechanism for Alternate Hardware Interface)
The lack of protections on alternate paths to access
control-protected assets (such as unprotected shadow registers
and other external facing unguarded interfaces) allows an
attacker to bypass existing protections to the asset that are
only performed against the primary path.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
306
(Missing Authentication for Critical Function) >
288
(Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel) >
425
(Direct Request ('Forced Browsing'))
The web application does not adequately enforce appropriate authorization on all restricted URLs, scripts, or files.
forced browsing
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
306
(Missing Authentication for Critical Function) >
322
(Key Exchange without Entity Authentication)
The product performs a key exchange with an actor without verifying the identity of that actor.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
287
(Improper Authentication) >
645
(Overly Restrictive Account Lockout Mechanism)
The product contains an account lockout protection mechanism, but the mechanism is too restrictive and can be triggered too easily, which allows attackers to deny service to legitimate users by causing their accounts to be locked out.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
346
(Origin Validation Error)
The product does not properly verify that the source of data or communication is valid.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
346
(Origin Validation Error) >
1385
(Missing Origin Validation in WebSockets)
The product uses a WebSocket, but it does not properly verify that the source of data or communication is valid.
Cross-Site WebSocket hijacking (CSWSH)
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
346
(Origin Validation Error) >
940
(Improper Verification of Source of a Communication Channel)
The product establishes a communication channel to handle an incoming request that has been initiated by an actor, but it does not properly verify that the request is coming from the expected origin.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
346
(Origin Validation Error) >
940
(Improper Verification of Source of a Communication Channel) >
925
(Improper Verification of Intent by Broadcast Receiver)
The Android application uses a Broadcast Receiver that receives an Intent but does not properly verify that the Intent came from an authorized source.
Intent Spoofing
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
749
(Exposed Dangerous Method or Function)
The product provides an Applications Programming Interface (API) or similar interface for interaction with external actors, but the interface includes a dangerous method or function that is not properly restricted.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
749
(Exposed Dangerous Method or Function) >
618
(Exposed Unsafe ActiveX Method)
An ActiveX control is intended for use in a web browser, but it exposes dangerous methods that perform actions that are outside of the browser's security model (e.g. the zone or domain).
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
749
(Exposed Dangerous Method or Function) >
782
(Exposed IOCTL with Insufficient Access Control)
The product implements an IOCTL with functionality that should be restricted, but it does not properly enforce access control for the IOCTL.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
923
(Improper Restriction of Communication Channel to Intended Endpoints)
The product establishes a communication channel to (or from) an endpoint for privileged or protected operations, but it does not properly ensure that it is communicating with the correct endpoint.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
923
(Improper Restriction of Communication Channel to Intended Endpoints) >
1275
(Sensitive Cookie with Improper SameSite Attribute)
The SameSite attribute for sensitive cookies is not set, or an insecure value is used.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
923
(Improper Restriction of Communication Channel to Intended Endpoints) >
291
(Reliance on IP Address for Authentication)
The product uses an IP address for authentication.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
923
(Improper Restriction of Communication Channel to Intended Endpoints) >
297
(Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch)
The product communicates with a host that provides a certificate, but the product does not properly ensure that the certificate is actually associated with that host.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
923
(Improper Restriction of Communication Channel to Intended Endpoints) >
300
(Channel Accessible by Non-Endpoint)
The product does not adequately verify the identity of actors at both ends of a communication channel, or does not adequately ensure the integrity of the channel, in a way that allows the channel to be accessed or influenced by an actor that is not an endpoint.
Adversary-in-the-Middle / AITM
Man-in-the-Middle / MITM
Person-in-the-Middle / PITM
Monkey-in-the-Middle
Monster-in-the-Middle
Manipulator-in-the-Middle
On-path attack
Interception attack
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
923
(Improper Restriction of Communication Channel to Intended Endpoints) >
419
(Unprotected Primary Channel)
The product uses a primary channel for administration or restricted functionality, but it does not properly protect the channel.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
923
(Improper Restriction of Communication Channel to Intended Endpoints) >
420
(Unprotected Alternate Channel)
The product protects a primary channel, but it does not use the same level of protection for an alternate channel.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
923
(Improper Restriction of Communication Channel to Intended Endpoints) >
420
(Unprotected Alternate Channel) >
1299
(Missing Protection Mechanism for Alternate Hardware Interface)
The lack of protections on alternate paths to access
control-protected assets (such as unprotected shadow registers
and other external facing unguarded interfaces) allows an
attacker to bypass existing protections to the asset that are
only performed against the primary path.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
923
(Improper Restriction of Communication Channel to Intended Endpoints) >
420
(Unprotected Alternate Channel) >
421
(Race Condition During Access to Alternate Channel)
The product opens an alternate channel to communicate with an authorized user, but the channel is accessible to other actors.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
923
(Improper Restriction of Communication Channel to Intended Endpoints) >
420
(Unprotected Alternate Channel) >
422
(Unprotected Windows Messaging Channel ('Shatter'))
The product does not properly verify the source of a message in the Windows Messaging System while running at elevated privileges, creating an alternate channel through which an attacker can directly send a message to the product.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
923
(Improper Restriction of Communication Channel to Intended Endpoints) >
940
(Improper Verification of Source of a Communication Channel)
The product establishes a communication channel to handle an incoming request that has been initiated by an actor, but it does not properly verify that the request is coming from the expected origin.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
923
(Improper Restriction of Communication Channel to Intended Endpoints) >
940
(Improper Verification of Source of a Communication Channel) >
925
(Improper Verification of Intent by Broadcast Receiver)
The Android application uses a Broadcast Receiver that receives an Intent but does not properly verify that the Intent came from an authorized source.
Intent Spoofing
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
923
(Improper Restriction of Communication Channel to Intended Endpoints) >
941
(Incorrectly Specified Destination in a Communication Channel)
The product creates a communication channel to initiate an outgoing request to an actor, but it does not correctly specify the intended destination for that actor.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
284
(Improper Access Control) >
923
(Improper Restriction of Communication Channel to Intended Endpoints) >
942
(Permissive Cross-domain Policy with Untrusted Domains)
The product uses a cross-domain policy file that includes domains that should not be trusted.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
435
(Improper Interaction Between Multiple Correctly-Behaving Entities)
An interaction error occurs when two entities have correct behavior when running independently of each other, but when they are integrated as components in a larger system or process, they introduce incorrect behaviors that may cause resultant weaknesses.
Interaction Error
Emergent Fault
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
435
(Improper Interaction Between Multiple Correctly-Behaving Entities) >
1038
(Insecure Automated Optimizations)
The product uses a mechanism that automatically optimizes code, e.g. to improve a characteristic such as performance, but the optimizations can have an unintended side effect that might violate an intended security assumption.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
435
(Improper Interaction Between Multiple Correctly-Behaving Entities) >
1038
(Insecure Automated Optimizations) >
1037
(Processor Optimization Removal or Modification of Security-critical Code)
The developer builds a security-critical protection mechanism into the software, but the processor optimizes the execution of the program such that the mechanism is removed or modified.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
435
(Improper Interaction Between Multiple Correctly-Behaving Entities) >
1038
(Insecure Automated Optimizations) >
733
(Compiler Optimization Removal or Modification of Security-critical Code)
The developer builds a security-critical protection mechanism into the software, but the compiler optimizes the program such that the mechanism is removed or modified.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
435
(Improper Interaction Between Multiple Correctly-Behaving Entities) >
1038
(Insecure Automated Optimizations) >
733
(Compiler Optimization Removal or Modification of Security-critical Code) >
14
(Compiler Removal of Code to Clear Buffers)
Sensitive memory is cleared according to the source code, but compiler optimizations leave the memory untouched when it is not read from again, aka "dead store removal."
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
435
(Improper Interaction Between Multiple Correctly-Behaving Entities) >
188
(Reliance on Data/Memory Layout)
The product makes invalid assumptions about how protocol data or memory is organized at a lower level, resulting in unintended program behavior.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
435
(Improper Interaction Between Multiple Correctly-Behaving Entities) >
188
(Reliance on Data/Memory Layout) >
198
(Use of Incorrect Byte Ordering)
The product receives input from an upstream component, but it does not account for byte ordering (e.g. big-endian and little-endian) when processing the input, causing an incorrect number or value to be used.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
435
(Improper Interaction Between Multiple Correctly-Behaving Entities) >
436
(Interpretation Conflict)
Product A handles inputs or steps differently than Product B, which causes A to perform incorrect actions based on its perception of B's state.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
435
(Improper Interaction Between Multiple Correctly-Behaving Entities) >
436
(Interpretation Conflict) >
113
(Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers ('HTTP Request/Response Splitting'))
The product receives data from an HTTP agent/component (e.g., web server, proxy, browser, etc.), but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes CR and LF characters before the data is included in outgoing HTTP headers.
HTTP Request Splitting
HTTP Response Splitting
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
435
(Improper Interaction Between Multiple Correctly-Behaving Entities) >
436
(Interpretation Conflict) >
115
(Misinterpretation of Input)
The product misinterprets an input, whether from an attacker or another product, in a security-relevant fashion.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
435
(Improper Interaction Between Multiple Correctly-Behaving Entities) >
436
(Interpretation Conflict) >
437
(Incomplete Model of Endpoint Features)
A product acts as an intermediary or monitor between two or more endpoints, but it does not have a complete model of an endpoint's features, behaviors, or state, potentially causing the product to perform incorrect actions based on this incomplete model.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
435
(Improper Interaction Between Multiple Correctly-Behaving Entities) >
436
(Interpretation Conflict) >
444
(Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling'))
The product acts as an intermediary HTTP agent
(such as a proxy or firewall) in the data flow between two
entities such as a client and server, but it does not
interpret malformed HTTP requests or responses in ways that
are consistent with how the messages will be processed by
those entities that are at the ultimate destination.
HTTP Request Smuggling
HTTP Response Smuggling
HTTP Smuggling
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
435
(Improper Interaction Between Multiple Correctly-Behaving Entities) >
436
(Interpretation Conflict) >
626
(Null Byte Interaction Error (Poison Null Byte))
The product does not properly handle null bytes or NUL characters when passing data between different representations or components.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
435
(Improper Interaction Between Multiple Correctly-Behaving Entities) >
436
(Interpretation Conflict) >
650
(Trusting HTTP Permission Methods on the Server Side)
The server contains a protection mechanism that assumes that any URI that is accessed using HTTP GET will not cause a state change to the associated resource. This might allow attackers to bypass intended access restrictions and conduct resource modification and deletion attacks, since some applications allow GET to modify state.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
435
(Improper Interaction Between Multiple Correctly-Behaving Entities) >
436
(Interpretation Conflict) >
86
(Improper Neutralization of Invalid Characters in Identifiers in Web Pages)
The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes invalid characters or byte sequences in the middle of tag names, URI schemes, and other identifiers.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
435
(Improper Interaction Between Multiple Correctly-Behaving Entities) >
439
(Behavioral Change in New Version or Environment)
A's behavior or functionality changes with a new version of A, or a new environment, which is not known (or manageable) by B.
Functional change
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime)
The product does not maintain or incorrectly maintains control over a resource throughout its lifetime of creation, use, and release.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
118
(Incorrect Access of Indexable Resource ('Range Error'))
The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts operations within the boundaries of a resource that is accessed using an index or pointer, such as memory or files.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
118
(Incorrect Access of Indexable Resource ('Range Error')) >
119
(Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer)
The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it reads from or writes to a memory location outside the buffer's intended boundary. This may result in read or write operations on unexpected memory locations that could be linked to other variables, data structures, or internal program data.
Buffer Overflow
buffer overrun
memory safety
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
118
(Incorrect Access of Indexable Resource ('Range Error')) >
119
(Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer) >
120
(Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow'))
The product copies an input buffer to an output buffer without verifying that the size of the input buffer is less than the size of the output buffer, leading to a buffer overflow.
Classic Buffer Overflow
Unbounded Transfer
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
118
(Incorrect Access of Indexable Resource ('Range Error')) >
119
(Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer) >
120
(Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')) >
785
(Use of Path Manipulation Function without Maximum-sized Buffer)
The product invokes a function for normalizing paths or file names, but it provides an output buffer that is smaller than the maximum possible size, such as PATH_MAX.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
118
(Incorrect Access of Indexable Resource ('Range Error')) >
119
(Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer) >
125
(Out-of-bounds Read)
The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.
OOB read
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
118
(Incorrect Access of Indexable Resource ('Range Error')) >
119
(Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer) >
125
(Out-of-bounds Read) >
126
(Buffer Over-read)
The product reads from a buffer using buffer access mechanisms such as indexes or pointers that reference memory locations after the targeted buffer.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
118
(Incorrect Access of Indexable Resource ('Range Error')) >
119
(Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer) >
125
(Out-of-bounds Read) >
127
(Buffer Under-read)
The product reads from a buffer using buffer access mechanisms such as indexes or pointers that reference memory locations prior to the targeted buffer.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
118
(Incorrect Access of Indexable Resource ('Range Error')) >
119
(Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer) >
466
(Return of Pointer Value Outside of Expected Range)
A function can return a pointer to memory that is outside of the buffer that the pointer is expected to reference.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
118
(Incorrect Access of Indexable Resource ('Range Error')) >
119
(Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer) >
786
(Access of Memory Location Before Start of Buffer)
The product reads or writes to a buffer using an index or pointer that references a memory location prior to the beginning of the buffer.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
118
(Incorrect Access of Indexable Resource ('Range Error')) >
119
(Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer) >
786
(Access of Memory Location Before Start of Buffer) >
124
(Buffer Underwrite ('Buffer Underflow'))
The product writes to a buffer using an index or pointer that references a memory location prior to the beginning of the buffer.
buffer underrun
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
118
(Incorrect Access of Indexable Resource ('Range Error')) >
119
(Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer) >
786
(Access of Memory Location Before Start of Buffer) >
127
(Buffer Under-read)
The product reads from a buffer using buffer access mechanisms such as indexes or pointers that reference memory locations prior to the targeted buffer.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
118
(Incorrect Access of Indexable Resource ('Range Error')) >
119
(Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer) >
787
(Out-of-bounds Write)
The product writes data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.
Memory Corruption
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
118
(Incorrect Access of Indexable Resource ('Range Error')) >
119
(Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer) >
787
(Out-of-bounds Write) >
121
(Stack-based Buffer Overflow)
A stack-based buffer overflow condition is a condition where the buffer being overwritten is allocated on the stack (i.e., is a local variable or, rarely, a parameter to a function).
Stack Overflow
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
118
(Incorrect Access of Indexable Resource ('Range Error')) >
119
(Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer) >
787
(Out-of-bounds Write) >
122
(Heap-based Buffer Overflow)
A heap overflow condition is a buffer overflow, where the buffer that can be overwritten is allocated in the heap portion of memory, generally meaning that the buffer was allocated using a routine such as malloc().
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
118
(Incorrect Access of Indexable Resource ('Range Error')) >
119
(Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer) >
787
(Out-of-bounds Write) >
123
(Write-what-where Condition)
Any condition where the attacker has the ability to write an arbitrary value to an arbitrary location, often as the result of a buffer overflow.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
118
(Incorrect Access of Indexable Resource ('Range Error')) >
119
(Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer) >
787
(Out-of-bounds Write) >
124
(Buffer Underwrite ('Buffer Underflow'))
The product writes to a buffer using an index or pointer that references a memory location prior to the beginning of the buffer.
buffer underrun
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
118
(Incorrect Access of Indexable Resource ('Range Error')) >
119
(Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer) >
788
(Access of Memory Location After End of Buffer)
The product reads or writes to a buffer using an index or pointer that references a memory location after the end of the buffer.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
118
(Incorrect Access of Indexable Resource ('Range Error')) >
119
(Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer) >
788
(Access of Memory Location After End of Buffer) >
121
(Stack-based Buffer Overflow)
A stack-based buffer overflow condition is a condition where the buffer being overwritten is allocated on the stack (i.e., is a local variable or, rarely, a parameter to a function).
Stack Overflow
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
118
(Incorrect Access of Indexable Resource ('Range Error')) >
119
(Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer) >
788
(Access of Memory Location After End of Buffer) >
122
(Heap-based Buffer Overflow)
A heap overflow condition is a buffer overflow, where the buffer that can be overwritten is allocated in the heap portion of memory, generally meaning that the buffer was allocated using a routine such as malloc().
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
118
(Incorrect Access of Indexable Resource ('Range Error')) >
119
(Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer) >
788
(Access of Memory Location After End of Buffer) >
126
(Buffer Over-read)
The product reads from a buffer using buffer access mechanisms such as indexes or pointers that reference memory locations after the targeted buffer.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
118
(Incorrect Access of Indexable Resource ('Range Error')) >
119
(Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer) >
805
(Buffer Access with Incorrect Length Value)
The product uses a sequential operation to read or write a buffer, but it uses an incorrect length value that causes it to access memory that is outside of the bounds of the buffer.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
118
(Incorrect Access of Indexable Resource ('Range Error')) >
119
(Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer) >
805
(Buffer Access with Incorrect Length Value) >
806
(Buffer Access Using Size of Source Buffer)
The product uses the size of a source buffer when reading from or writing to a destination buffer, which may cause it to access memory that is outside of the bounds of the buffer.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
118
(Incorrect Access of Indexable Resource ('Range Error')) >
119
(Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer) >
822
(Untrusted Pointer Dereference)
The product obtains a value from an untrusted source, converts this value to a pointer, and dereferences the resulting pointer.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
118
(Incorrect Access of Indexable Resource ('Range Error')) >
119
(Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer) >
823
(Use of Out-of-range Pointer Offset)
The product performs pointer arithmetic on a valid pointer, but it uses an offset that can point outside of the intended range of valid memory locations for the resulting pointer.
Untrusted pointer offset
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
118
(Incorrect Access of Indexable Resource ('Range Error')) >
119
(Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer) >
824
(Access of Uninitialized Pointer)
The product accesses or uses a pointer that has not been initialized.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
118
(Incorrect Access of Indexable Resource ('Range Error')) >
119
(Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer) >
825
(Expired Pointer Dereference)
The product dereferences a pointer that contains a location for memory that was previously valid, but is no longer valid.
Dangling pointer
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
118
(Incorrect Access of Indexable Resource ('Range Error')) >
119
(Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer) >
825
(Expired Pointer Dereference) >
415
(Double Free)
The product calls free() twice on the same memory address, potentially leading to modification of unexpected memory locations.
Double-free
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
118
(Incorrect Access of Indexable Resource ('Range Error')) >
119
(Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer) >
825
(Expired Pointer Dereference) >
416
(Use After Free)
The product reuses or references memory after it has been freed. At some point afterward, the memory may be allocated again and saved in another pointer, while the original pointer references a location somewhere within the new allocation. Any operations using the original pointer are no longer valid because the memory "belongs" to the code that operates on the new pointer.
Dangling pointer
UAF
Use-After-Free
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
1229
(Creation of Emergent Resource)
The product manages resources or behaves in a way that indirectly creates a new, distinct resource that can be used by attackers in violation of the intended policy.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
1229
(Creation of Emergent Resource) >
514
(Covert Channel)
A covert channel is a path that can be used to transfer information in a way not intended by the system's designers.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
1229
(Creation of Emergent Resource) >
514
(Covert Channel) >
385
(Covert Timing Channel)
Covert timing channels convey information by modulating some aspect of system behavior over time, so that the program receiving the information can observe system behavior and infer protected information.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
1229
(Creation of Emergent Resource) >
514
(Covert Channel) >
515
(Covert Storage Channel)
A covert storage channel transfers information through the setting of bits by one program and the reading of those bits by another. What distinguishes this case from that of ordinary operation is that the bits are used to convey encoded information.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
1250
(Improper Preservation of Consistency Between Independent Representations of Shared State)
The product has or supports multiple distributed components or sub-systems that are each required to keep their own local copy of shared data - such as state or cache - but the product does not ensure that all local copies remain consistent with each other.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
1250
(Improper Preservation of Consistency Between Independent Representations of Shared State) >
1249
(Application-Level Admin Tool with Inconsistent View of Underlying Operating System)
The product provides an application for administrators to manage parts of the underlying operating system, but the application does not accurately identify all of the relevant entities or resources that exist in the OS; that is, the application's model of the OS's state is inconsistent with the OS's actual state.
Ghost in the Shell
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
1250
(Improper Preservation of Consistency Between Independent Representations of Shared State) >
1251
(Mirrored Regions with Different Values)
The product's architecture mirrors regions without ensuring that their contents always stay in sync.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
1329
(Reliance on Component That is Not Updateable)
The product contains a component that cannot be updated or patched in order to remove vulnerabilities or significant bugs.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
1329
(Reliance on Component That is Not Updateable) >
1277
(Firmware Not Updateable)
The product does not provide its
users with the ability to update or patch its
firmware to address any vulnerabilities or
weaknesses that may be present.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
1329
(Reliance on Component That is Not Updateable) >
1310
(Missing Ability to Patch ROM Code)
Missing an ability to patch ROM code may leave a System or System-on-Chip (SoC) in a vulnerable state.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
221
(Information Loss or Omission)
The product does not record, or improperly records, security-relevant information that leads to an incorrect decision or hampers later analysis.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
221
(Information Loss or Omission) >
222
(Truncation of Security-relevant Information)
The product truncates the display, recording, or processing of security-relevant information in a way that can obscure the source or nature of an attack.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
221
(Information Loss or Omission) >
223
(Omission of Security-relevant Information)
The product does not record or display information that would be important for identifying the source or nature of an attack, or determining if an action is safe.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
221
(Information Loss or Omission) >
223
(Omission of Security-relevant Information) >
778
(Insufficient Logging)
When a security-critical event occurs, the product either does not record the event or omits important details about the event when logging it.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
221
(Information Loss or Omission) >
224
(Obscured Security-relevant Information by Alternate Name)
The product records security-relevant information according to an alternate name of the affected entity, instead of the canonical name.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
221
(Information Loss or Omission) >
356
(Product UI does not Warn User of Unsafe Actions)
The product's user interface does not warn the user before undertaking an unsafe action on behalf of that user. This makes it easier for attackers to trick users into inflicting damage to their system.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
221
(Information Loss or Omission) >
396
(Declaration of Catch for Generic Exception)
Catching overly broad exceptions promotes complex error handling code that is more likely to contain security vulnerabilities.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
221
(Information Loss or Omission) >
397
(Declaration of Throws for Generic Exception)
Throwing overly broad exceptions promotes complex error handling code that is more likely to contain security vulnerabilities.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
221
(Information Loss or Omission) >
451
(User Interface (UI) Misrepresentation of Critical Information)
The user interface (UI) does not properly represent critical information to the user, allowing the information - or its source - to be obscured or spoofed. This is often a component in phishing attacks.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
221
(Information Loss or Omission) >
451
(User Interface (UI) Misrepresentation of Critical Information) >
1007
(Insufficient Visual Distinction of Homoglyphs Presented to User)
The product displays information or identifiers to a user, but the display mechanism does not make it easy for the user to distinguish between visually similar or identical glyphs (homoglyphs), which may cause the user to misinterpret a glyph and perform an unintended, insecure action.
Homograph Attack
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
221
(Information Loss or Omission) >
451
(User Interface (UI) Misrepresentation of Critical Information) >
1021
(Improper Restriction of Rendered UI Layers or Frames)
The web application does not restrict or incorrectly restricts frame objects or UI layers that belong to another application or domain, which can lead to user confusion about which interface the user is interacting with.
Clickjacking
UI Redress Attack
Tapjacking
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
372
(Incomplete Internal State Distinction)
The product does not properly determine which state it is in, causing it to assume it is in state X when in fact it is in state Y, causing it to perform incorrect operations in a security-relevant manner.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
400
(Uncontrolled Resource Consumption)
The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource, thereby enabling an actor to influence the amount of resources consumed, eventually leading to the exhaustion of available resources.
Resource Exhaustion
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
400
(Uncontrolled Resource Consumption) >
1235
(Incorrect Use of Autoboxing and Unboxing for Performance Critical Operations)
The code uses boxed primitives, which may introduce inefficiencies into performance-critical operations.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
400
(Uncontrolled Resource Consumption) >
1246
(Improper Write Handling in Limited-write Non-Volatile Memories)
The product does not implement or incorrectly implements wear leveling operations in limited-write non-volatile memories.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
400
(Uncontrolled Resource Consumption) >
405
(Asymmetric Resource Consumption (Amplification))
The product does not properly control situations in which an adversary can cause the product to consume or produce excessive resources without requiring the adversary to invest equivalent work or otherwise prove authorization, i.e., the adversary's influence is "asymmetric."
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
400
(Uncontrolled Resource Consumption) >
405
(Asymmetric Resource Consumption (Amplification)) >
1050
(Excessive Platform Resource Consumption within a Loop)
The product has a loop body or loop condition that contains a control element that directly or
indirectly consumes platform resources, e.g. messaging, sessions, locks, or file
descriptors.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
400
(Uncontrolled Resource Consumption) >
405
(Asymmetric Resource Consumption (Amplification)) >
1072
(Data Resource Access without Use of Connection Pooling)
The product accesses a data resource through a database without using a
connection pooling capability.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
400
(Uncontrolled Resource Consumption) >
405
(Asymmetric Resource Consumption (Amplification)) >
1073
(Non-SQL Invokable Control Element with Excessive Number of Data Resource Accesses)
The product contains a client with a function or method that contains a large number of data accesses/queries that are sent through a data manager, i.e., does not use efficient database capabilities.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
400
(Uncontrolled Resource Consumption) >
405
(Asymmetric Resource Consumption (Amplification)) >
1084
(Invokable Control Element with Excessive File or Data Access Operations)
A function or method contains too many
operations that utilize a data manager or file resource.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
400
(Uncontrolled Resource Consumption) >
405
(Asymmetric Resource Consumption (Amplification)) >
1089
(Large Data Table with Excessive Number of Indices)
The product uses a large data table that contains an excessively large number of
indices.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
400
(Uncontrolled Resource Consumption) >
405
(Asymmetric Resource Consumption (Amplification)) >
1094
(Excessive Index Range Scan for a Data Resource)
The product contains an index range scan for a large data table,
but the scan can cover a large number of rows.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
400
(Uncontrolled Resource Consumption) >
405
(Asymmetric Resource Consumption (Amplification)) >
1176
(Inefficient CPU Computation)
The product performs CPU computations using
algorithms that are not as efficient as they could be for the
needs of the developer, i.e., the computations can be
optimized further.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
400
(Uncontrolled Resource Consumption) >
405
(Asymmetric Resource Consumption (Amplification)) >
1176
(Inefficient CPU Computation) >
1042
(Static Member Data Element outside of a Singleton Class Element)
The code contains a member element that is declared as static (but not final), in which
its parent class element
is not a singleton class - that is, a class element that can be used only once in
the 'to' association of a Create action.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
400
(Uncontrolled Resource Consumption) >
405
(Asymmetric Resource Consumption (Amplification)) >
1176
(Inefficient CPU Computation) >
1046
(Creation of Immutable Text Using String Concatenation)
The product creates an immutable text string using string concatenation operations.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
400
(Uncontrolled Resource Consumption) >
405
(Asymmetric Resource Consumption (Amplification)) >
1176
(Inefficient CPU Computation) >
1049
(Excessive Data Query Operations in a Large Data Table)
The product performs a data query with a large number of joins
and sub-queries on a large data table.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
400
(Uncontrolled Resource Consumption) >
405
(Asymmetric Resource Consumption (Amplification)) >
1176
(Inefficient CPU Computation) >
1063
(Creation of Class Instance within a Static Code Block)
A static code block creates an instance of a class.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
400
(Uncontrolled Resource Consumption) >
405
(Asymmetric Resource Consumption (Amplification)) >
1176
(Inefficient CPU Computation) >
1067
(Excessive Execution of Sequential Searches of Data Resource)
The product contains a data query against an SQL table or view
that is configured in a way that does not utilize an index and may cause
sequential searches to be performed.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
400
(Uncontrolled Resource Consumption) >
405
(Asymmetric Resource Consumption (Amplification)) >
406
(Insufficient Control of Network Message Volume (Network Amplification))
The product does not sufficiently monitor or control transmitted network traffic volume, so that an actor can cause the product to transmit more traffic than should be allowed for that actor.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
400
(Uncontrolled Resource Consumption) >
405
(Asymmetric Resource Consumption (Amplification)) >
407
(Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity)
An algorithm in a product has an inefficient worst-case computational complexity that may be detrimental to system performance and can be triggered by an attacker, typically using crafted manipulations that ensure that the worst case is being reached.
Quadratic Complexity
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
400
(Uncontrolled Resource Consumption) >
405
(Asymmetric Resource Consumption (Amplification)) >
407
(Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity) >
1333
(Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity)
The product uses a regular expression with an inefficient, possibly exponential worst-case computational complexity that consumes excessive CPU cycles.
ReDoS
Regular Expression Denial of Service
Catastrophic backtracking
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
400
(Uncontrolled Resource Consumption) >
405
(Asymmetric Resource Consumption (Amplification)) >
408
(Incorrect Behavior Order: Early Amplification)
The product allows an entity to perform a legitimate but expensive operation before authentication or authorization has taken place.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
400
(Uncontrolled Resource Consumption) >
405
(Asymmetric Resource Consumption (Amplification)) >
409
(Improper Handling of Highly Compressed Data (Data Amplification))
The product does not handle or incorrectly handles a compressed input with a very high compression ratio that produces a large output.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
400
(Uncontrolled Resource Consumption) >
405
(Asymmetric Resource Consumption (Amplification)) >
776
(Improper Restriction of Recursive Entity References in DTDs ('XML Entity Expansion'))
The product uses XML documents and allows their structure to be defined with a Document Type Definition (DTD), but it does not properly control the number of recursive definitions of entities.
XEE
Billion Laughs Attack
XML Bomb
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
400
(Uncontrolled Resource Consumption) >
770
(Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling)
The product allocates a reusable resource or group of resources on behalf of an actor without imposing any restrictions on the size or number of resources that can be allocated, in violation of the intended security policy for that actor.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
400
(Uncontrolled Resource Consumption) >
770
(Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling) >
1325
(Improperly Controlled Sequential Memory Allocation)
The product manages a group of objects or resources and performs a separate memory allocation for each object, but it does not properly limit the total amount of memory that is consumed by all of the combined objects.
Stack Exhaustion
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
400
(Uncontrolled Resource Consumption) >
770
(Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling) >
774
(Allocation of File Descriptors or Handles Without Limits or Throttling)
The product allocates file descriptors or handles on behalf of an actor without imposing any restrictions on how many descriptors can be allocated, in violation of the intended security policy for that actor.
File Descriptor Exhaustion
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
400
(Uncontrolled Resource Consumption) >
770
(Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling) >
789
(Memory Allocation with Excessive Size Value)
The product allocates memory based on an untrusted, large size value, but it does not ensure that the size is within expected limits, allowing arbitrary amounts of memory to be allocated.
Stack Exhaustion
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
400
(Uncontrolled Resource Consumption) >
771
(Missing Reference to Active Allocated Resource)
The product does not properly maintain a reference to a resource that has been allocated, which prevents the resource from being reclaimed.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
400
(Uncontrolled Resource Consumption) >
771
(Missing Reference to Active Allocated Resource) >
773
(Missing Reference to Active File Descriptor or Handle)
The product does not properly maintain references to a file descriptor or handle, which prevents that file descriptor/handle from being reclaimed.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
400
(Uncontrolled Resource Consumption) >
779
(Logging of Excessive Data)
The product logs too much information, making log files hard to process and possibly hindering recovery efforts or forensic analysis after an attack.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
400
(Uncontrolled Resource Consumption) >
920
(Improper Restriction of Power Consumption)
The product operates in an environment in which power is a limited resource that cannot be automatically replenished, but the product does not properly restrict the amount of power that its operation consumes.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
404
(Improper Resource Shutdown or Release)
The product does not release or incorrectly releases a resource before it is made available for re-use.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
404
(Improper Resource Shutdown or Release) >
1266
(Improper Scrubbing of Sensitive Data from Decommissioned Device)
The product does not properly provide a capability for the product administrator to remove sensitive data at the time the product is decommissioned. A scrubbing capability could be missing, insufficient, or incorrect.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
404
(Improper Resource Shutdown or Release) >
299
(Improper Check for Certificate Revocation)
The product does not check or incorrectly checks the revocation status of a certificate, which may cause it to use a certificate that has been compromised.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
404
(Improper Resource Shutdown or Release) >
299
(Improper Check for Certificate Revocation) >
370
(Missing Check for Certificate Revocation after Initial Check)
The product does not check the revocation status of a certificate after its initial revocation check, which can cause the product to perform privileged actions even after the certificate is revoked at a later time.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
404
(Improper Resource Shutdown or Release) >
459
(Incomplete Cleanup)
The product does not properly "clean up" and remove temporary or supporting resources after they have been used.
Insufficient Cleanup
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
404
(Improper Resource Shutdown or Release) >
459
(Incomplete Cleanup) >
226
(Sensitive Information in Resource Not Removed Before Reuse)
The product releases a resource such as memory or a file so that it can be made available for reuse, but it does not clear or "zeroize" the information contained in the resource before the product performs a critical state transition or makes the resource available for reuse by other entities.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
404
(Improper Resource Shutdown or Release) >
459
(Incomplete Cleanup) >
226
(Sensitive Information in Resource Not Removed Before Reuse) >
1239
(Improper Zeroization of Hardware Register)
The hardware product does not properly clear sensitive information from built-in registers when the user of the hardware block changes.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
404
(Improper Resource Shutdown or Release) >
459
(Incomplete Cleanup) >
226
(Sensitive Information in Resource Not Removed Before Reuse) >
1272
(Sensitive Information Uncleared Before Debug/Power State Transition)
The product performs a power or debug state transition, but it does not clear sensitive information that should no longer be accessible due to changes to information access restrictions.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
404
(Improper Resource Shutdown or Release) >
459
(Incomplete Cleanup) >
226
(Sensitive Information in Resource Not Removed Before Reuse) >
1301
(Insufficient or Incomplete Data Removal within Hardware Component)
The product's data removal process does not completely delete all data and potentially sensitive information within hardware components.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
404
(Improper Resource Shutdown or Release) >
459
(Incomplete Cleanup) >
226
(Sensitive Information in Resource Not Removed Before Reuse) >
1301
(Insufficient or Incomplete Data Removal within Hardware Component) >
1330
(Remanent Data Readable after Memory Erase)
Confidential information stored in memory circuits is readable or recoverable after being cleared or erased.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
404
(Improper Resource Shutdown or Release) >
459
(Incomplete Cleanup) >
226
(Sensitive Information in Resource Not Removed Before Reuse) >
1342
(Information Exposure through Microarchitectural State after Transient Execution)
The processor does not properly clear microarchitectural state after incorrect microcode assists or speculative execution, resulting in transient execution.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
404
(Improper Resource Shutdown or Release) >
459
(Incomplete Cleanup) >
226
(Sensitive Information in Resource Not Removed Before Reuse) >
244
(Improper Clearing of Heap Memory Before Release ('Heap Inspection'))
Using realloc() to resize buffers that store sensitive information can leave the sensitive information exposed to attack, because it is not removed from memory.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
404
(Improper Resource Shutdown or Release) >
459
(Incomplete Cleanup) >
460
(Improper Cleanup on Thrown Exception)
The product does not clean up its state or incorrectly cleans up its state when an exception is thrown, leading to unexpected state or control flow.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
404
(Improper Resource Shutdown or Release) >
459
(Incomplete Cleanup) >
568
(finalize() Method Without super.finalize())
The product contains a finalize() method that does not call super.finalize().
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
404
(Improper Resource Shutdown or Release) >
763
(Release of Invalid Pointer or Reference)
The product attempts to return a memory resource to the system, but it calls the wrong release function or calls the appropriate release function incorrectly.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
404
(Improper Resource Shutdown or Release) >
763
(Release of Invalid Pointer or Reference) >
761
(Free of Pointer not at Start of Buffer)
The product calls free() on a pointer to a memory resource that was allocated on the heap, but the pointer is not at the start of the buffer.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
404
(Improper Resource Shutdown or Release) >
763
(Release of Invalid Pointer or Reference) >
762
(Mismatched Memory Management Routines)
The product attempts to return a memory resource to the system, but it calls a release function that is not compatible with the function that was originally used to allocate that resource.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
404
(Improper Resource Shutdown or Release) >
763
(Release of Invalid Pointer or Reference) >
762
(Mismatched Memory Management Routines) >
590
(Free of Memory not on the Heap)
The product calls free() on a pointer to memory that was not allocated using associated heap allocation functions such as malloc(), calloc(), or realloc().
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
404
(Improper Resource Shutdown or Release) >
772
(Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime)
The product does not release a resource after its effective lifetime has ended, i.e., after the resource is no longer needed.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
404
(Improper Resource Shutdown or Release) >
772
(Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime) >
1091
(Use of Object without Invoking Destructor Method)
The product contains a method that accesses an object but does not later invoke
the element's associated finalize/destructor method.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
404
(Improper Resource Shutdown or Release) >
772
(Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime) >
401
(Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime)
The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, which slowly consumes remaining memory.
Memory Leak
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
404
(Improper Resource Shutdown or Release) >
772
(Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime) >
775
(Missing Release of File Descriptor or Handle after Effective Lifetime)
The product does not release a file descriptor or handle after its effective lifetime has ended, i.e., after the file descriptor/handle is no longer needed.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
410
(Insufficient Resource Pool)
The product's resource pool is not large enough to handle peak demand, which allows an attacker to prevent others from accessing the resource by using a (relatively) large number of requests for resources.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
471
(Modification of Assumed-Immutable Data (MAID))
The product does not properly protect an assumed-immutable element from being modified by an attacker.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
471
(Modification of Assumed-Immutable Data (MAID)) >
291
(Reliance on IP Address for Authentication)
The product uses an IP address for authentication.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
471
(Modification of Assumed-Immutable Data (MAID)) >
472
(External Control of Assumed-Immutable Web Parameter)
The web application does not sufficiently verify inputs that are assumed to be immutable but are actually externally controllable, such as hidden form fields.
Assumed-Immutable Parameter Tampering
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
471
(Modification of Assumed-Immutable Data (MAID)) >
473
(PHP External Variable Modification)
A PHP application does not properly protect against the modification of variables from external sources, such as query parameters or cookies. This can expose the application to numerous weaknesses that would not exist otherwise.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
471
(Modification of Assumed-Immutable Data (MAID)) >
607
(Public Static Final Field References Mutable Object)
A public or protected static final field references a mutable object, which allows the object to be changed by malicious code, or accidentally from another package.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
487
(Reliance on Package-level Scope)
Java packages are not inherently closed; therefore, relying on them for code security is not a good practice.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
495
(Private Data Structure Returned From A Public Method)
The product has a method that is declared public, but returns a reference to a private data structure, which could then be modified in unexpected ways.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
496
(Public Data Assigned to Private Array-Typed Field)
Assigning public data to a private array is equivalent to giving public access to the array.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
501
(Trust Boundary Violation)
The product mixes trusted and untrusted data in the same data structure or structured message.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
580
(clone() Method Without super.clone())
The product contains a clone() method that does not call super.clone() to obtain the new object.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
610
(Externally Controlled Reference to a Resource in Another Sphere)
The product uses an externally controlled name or reference that resolves to a resource that is outside of the intended control sphere.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
610
(Externally Controlled Reference to a Resource in Another Sphere) >
15
(External Control of System or Configuration Setting)
One or more system settings or configuration elements can be externally controlled by a user.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
610
(Externally Controlled Reference to a Resource in Another Sphere) >
384
(Session Fixation)
Authenticating a user, or otherwise establishing a new user session, without invalidating any existing session identifier gives an attacker the opportunity to steal authenticated sessions.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
610
(Externally Controlled Reference to a Resource in Another Sphere) >
441
(Unintended Proxy or Intermediary ('Confused Deputy'))
The product receives a request, message, or directive from an upstream component, but the product does not sufficiently preserve the original source of the request before forwarding the request to an external actor that is outside of the product's control sphere. This causes the product to appear to be the source of the request, leading it to act as a proxy or other intermediary between the upstream component and the external actor.
Confused Deputy
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
610
(Externally Controlled Reference to a Resource in Another Sphere) >
441
(Unintended Proxy or Intermediary ('Confused Deputy')) >
1021
(Improper Restriction of Rendered UI Layers or Frames)
The web application does not restrict or incorrectly restricts frame objects or UI layers that belong to another application or domain, which can lead to user confusion about which interface the user is interacting with.
Clickjacking
UI Redress Attack
Tapjacking
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
610
(Externally Controlled Reference to a Resource in Another Sphere) >
441
(Unintended Proxy or Intermediary ('Confused Deputy')) >
918
(Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF))
The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination.
XSPA
SSRF
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
610
(Externally Controlled Reference to a Resource in Another Sphere) >
470
(Use of Externally-Controlled Input to Select Classes or Code ('Unsafe Reflection'))
The product uses external input with reflection to select which classes or code to use, but it does not sufficiently prevent the input from selecting improper classes or code.
Reflection Injection
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
610
(Externally Controlled Reference to a Resource in Another Sphere) >
601
(URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect'))
The web application accepts a user-controlled input that specifies a link to an external site, and uses that link in a redirect.
Open Redirect
Cross-site Redirect
Cross-domain Redirect
Unvalidated Redirect
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
610
(Externally Controlled Reference to a Resource in Another Sphere) >
611
(Improper Restriction of XML External Entity Reference)
The product processes an XML document that can contain XML entities with URIs that resolve to documents outside of the intended sphere of control, causing the product to embed incorrect documents into its output.
XXE
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
610
(Externally Controlled Reference to a Resource in Another Sphere) >
73
(External Control of File Name or Path)
The product allows user input to control or influence paths or file names that are used in filesystem operations.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
610
(Externally Controlled Reference to a Resource in Another Sphere) >
73
(External Control of File Name or Path) >
114
(Process Control)
Executing commands or loading libraries from an untrusted source or in an untrusted environment can cause an application to execute malicious commands (and payloads) on behalf of an attacker.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
662
(Improper Synchronization)
The product utilizes multiple threads or processes to allow temporary access to a shared resource that can only be exclusive to one process at a time, but it does not properly synchronize these actions, which might cause simultaneous accesses of this resource by multiple threads or processes.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
662
(Improper Synchronization) >
1058
(Invokable Control Element in Multi-Thread Context with non-Final Static Storable or Member Element)
The code contains a function or method that
operates in a multi-threaded environment but owns an unsafe non-final
static storable or member data element.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
662
(Improper Synchronization) >
663
(Use of a Non-reentrant Function in a Concurrent Context)
The product calls a non-reentrant function in a concurrent context in which a competing code sequence (e.g. thread or signal handler) may have an opportunity to call the same function or otherwise influence its state.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
662
(Improper Synchronization) >
663
(Use of a Non-reentrant Function in a Concurrent Context) >
479
(Signal Handler Use of a Non-reentrant Function)
The product defines a signal handler that calls a non-reentrant function.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
662
(Improper Synchronization) >
663
(Use of a Non-reentrant Function in a Concurrent Context) >
558
(Use of getlogin() in Multithreaded Application)
The product uses the getlogin() function in a multithreaded context, potentially causing it to return incorrect values.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
662
(Improper Synchronization) >
667
(Improper Locking)
The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
662
(Improper Synchronization) >
667
(Improper Locking) >
1232
(Improper Lock Behavior After Power State Transition)
Register lock bit protection disables changes to system configuration once the bit is set. Some of the protected registers or lock bits become programmable after power state transitions (e.g., Entry and wake from low power sleep modes) causing the system configuration to be changeable.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
662
(Improper Synchronization) >
667
(Improper Locking) >
1233
(Security-Sensitive Hardware Controls with Missing Lock Bit Protection)
The product uses a register lock bit protection mechanism, but it does not ensure that the lock bit prevents modification of system registers or controls that perform changes to important hardware system configuration.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
662
(Improper Synchronization) >
667
(Improper Locking) >
1234
(Hardware Internal or Debug Modes Allow Override of Locks)
System configuration protection may be bypassed during debug mode.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
662
(Improper Synchronization) >
667
(Improper Locking) >
412
(Unrestricted Externally Accessible Lock)
The product properly checks for the existence of a lock, but the lock can be externally controlled or influenced by an actor that is outside of the intended sphere of control.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
662
(Improper Synchronization) >
667
(Improper Locking) >
413
(Improper Resource Locking)
The product does not lock or does not correctly lock a resource when the product must have exclusive access to the resource.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
662
(Improper Synchronization) >
667
(Improper Locking) >
413
(Improper Resource Locking) >
591
(Sensitive Data Storage in Improperly Locked Memory)
The product stores sensitive data in memory that is not locked, or that has been incorrectly locked, which might cause the memory to be written to swap files on disk by the virtual memory manager. This can make the data more accessible to external actors.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
662
(Improper Synchronization) >
667
(Improper Locking) >
414
(Missing Lock Check)
A product does not check to see if a lock is present before performing sensitive operations on a resource.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
662
(Improper Synchronization) >
667
(Improper Locking) >
609
(Double-Checked Locking)
The product uses double-checked locking to access a resource without the overhead of explicit synchronization, but the locking is insufficient.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
662
(Improper Synchronization) >
667
(Improper Locking) >
764
(Multiple Locks of a Critical Resource)
The product locks a critical resource more times than intended, leading to an unexpected state in the system.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
662
(Improper Synchronization) >
667
(Improper Locking) >
765
(Multiple Unlocks of a Critical Resource)
The product unlocks a critical resource more times than intended, leading to an unexpected state in the system.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
662
(Improper Synchronization) >
667
(Improper Locking) >
832
(Unlock of a Resource that is not Locked)
The product attempts to unlock a resource that is not locked.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
662
(Improper Synchronization) >
667
(Improper Locking) >
833
(Deadlock)
The product contains multiple threads or executable segments that are waiting for each other to release a necessary lock, resulting in deadlock.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
662
(Improper Synchronization) >
820
(Missing Synchronization)
The product utilizes a shared resource in a concurrent manner but does not attempt to synchronize access to the resource.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
662
(Improper Synchronization) >
820
(Missing Synchronization) >
1096
(Singleton Class Instance Creation without Proper Locking or Synchronization)
The product implements a Singleton design pattern but does not use appropriate locking or other synchronization mechanism to ensure that the singleton class is only instantiated once.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
662
(Improper Synchronization) >
820
(Missing Synchronization) >
543
(Use of Singleton Pattern Without Synchronization in a Multithreaded Context)
The product uses the singleton pattern when creating a resource within a multithreaded environment.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
662
(Improper Synchronization) >
820
(Missing Synchronization) >
567
(Unsynchronized Access to Shared Data in a Multithreaded Context)
The product does not properly synchronize shared data, such as static variables across threads, which can lead to undefined behavior and unpredictable data changes.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
662
(Improper Synchronization) >
821
(Incorrect Synchronization)
The product utilizes a shared resource in a concurrent manner, but it does not correctly synchronize access to the resource.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
662
(Improper Synchronization) >
821
(Incorrect Synchronization) >
1088
(Synchronous Access of Remote Resource without Timeout)
The code has a synchronous call to a remote resource, but there is no timeout for the call, or the timeout is set to infinite.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
662
(Improper Synchronization) >
821
(Incorrect Synchronization) >
1264
(Hardware Logic with Insecure De-Synchronization between Control and Data Channels)
The hardware logic for error handling and security checks can incorrectly forward data before the security check is complete.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
662
(Improper Synchronization) >
821
(Incorrect Synchronization) >
572
(Call to Thread run() instead of start())
The product calls a thread's run() method instead of calling start(), which causes the code to run in the thread of the caller instead of the callee.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
662
(Improper Synchronization) >
821
(Incorrect Synchronization) >
574
(EJB Bad Practices: Use of Synchronization Primitives)
The product violates the Enterprise JavaBeans (EJB) specification by using thread synchronization primitives.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
665
(Improper Initialization)
The product does not initialize or incorrectly initializes a resource, which might leave the resource in an unexpected state when it is accessed or used.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
665
(Improper Initialization) >
1279
(Cryptographic Operations are run Before Supporting Units are Ready)
Performing cryptographic operations without ensuring that the supporting inputs are ready to supply valid data may compromise the cryptographic result.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
665
(Improper Initialization) >
1419
(Incorrect Initialization of Resource)
The product attempts to initialize a resource but does not correctly do so, which might leave the resource in an unexpected, incorrect, or insecure state when it is accessed.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
665
(Improper Initialization) >
1419
(Incorrect Initialization of Resource) >
1051
(Initialization with Hard-Coded Network Resource Configuration Data)
The product initializes data using hard-coded values that act as network resource identifiers.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
665
(Improper Initialization) >
1419
(Incorrect Initialization of Resource) >
1052
(Excessive Use of Hard-Coded Literals in Initialization)
The product initializes a data element using a hard-coded
literal that is not a simple integer or static constant element.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
665
(Improper Initialization) >
1419
(Incorrect Initialization of Resource) >
1188
(Initialization of a Resource with an Insecure Default)
The product initializes or sets a resource with a default that is intended to be changed by the administrator, but the default is not secure.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
665
(Improper Initialization) >
1419
(Incorrect Initialization of Resource) >
1188
(Initialization of a Resource with an Insecure Default) >
453
(Insecure Default Variable Initialization)
The product, by default, initializes an internal variable with an insecure or less secure value than is possible.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
665
(Improper Initialization) >
1419
(Incorrect Initialization of Resource) >
1221
(Incorrect Register Defaults or Module Parameters)
Hardware description language code incorrectly defines register defaults or hardware Intellectual Property (IP) parameters to insecure values.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
665
(Improper Initialization) >
1419
(Incorrect Initialization of Resource) >
454
(External Initialization of Trusted Variables or Data Stores)
The product initializes critical internal variables or data stores using inputs that can be modified by untrusted actors.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
665
(Improper Initialization) >
455
(Non-exit on Failed Initialization)
The product does not exit or otherwise modify its operation when security-relevant errors occur during initialization, such as when a configuration file has a format error or a hardware security module (HSM) cannot be activated, which can cause the product to execute in a less secure fashion than intended by the administrator.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
665
(Improper Initialization) >
770
(Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling)
The product allocates a reusable resource or group of resources on behalf of an actor without imposing any restrictions on the size or number of resources that can be allocated, in violation of the intended security policy for that actor.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
665
(Improper Initialization) >
770
(Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling) >
1325
(Improperly Controlled Sequential Memory Allocation)
The product manages a group of objects or resources and performs a separate memory allocation for each object, but it does not properly limit the total amount of memory that is consumed by all of the combined objects.
Stack Exhaustion
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
665
(Improper Initialization) >
770
(Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling) >
774
(Allocation of File Descriptors or Handles Without Limits or Throttling)
The product allocates file descriptors or handles on behalf of an actor without imposing any restrictions on how many descriptors can be allocated, in violation of the intended security policy for that actor.
File Descriptor Exhaustion
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
665
(Improper Initialization) >
770
(Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling) >
789
(Memory Allocation with Excessive Size Value)
The product allocates memory based on an untrusted, large size value, but it does not ensure that the size is within expected limits, allowing arbitrary amounts of memory to be allocated.
Stack Exhaustion
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
665
(Improper Initialization) >
908
(Use of Uninitialized Resource)
The product uses or accesses a resource that has not been initialized.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
665
(Improper Initialization) >
908
(Use of Uninitialized Resource) >
457
(Use of Uninitialized Variable)
The code uses a variable that has not been initialized, leading to unpredictable or unintended results.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
665
(Improper Initialization) >
909
(Missing Initialization of Resource)
The product does not initialize a critical resource.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
665
(Improper Initialization) >
909
(Missing Initialization of Resource) >
1271
(Uninitialized Value on Reset for Registers Holding Security Settings)
Security-critical logic is not set to a known value on reset.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
665
(Improper Initialization) >
909
(Missing Initialization of Resource) >
456
(Missing Initialization of a Variable)
The product does not initialize critical variables, which causes the execution environment to use unexpected values.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
666
(Operation on Resource in Wrong Phase of Lifetime)
The product performs an operation on a resource at the wrong phase of the resource's lifecycle, which can lead to unexpected behaviors.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
666
(Operation on Resource in Wrong Phase of Lifetime) >
415
(Double Free)
The product calls free() twice on the same memory address, potentially leading to modification of unexpected memory locations.
Double-free
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
666
(Operation on Resource in Wrong Phase of Lifetime) >
593
(Authentication Bypass: OpenSSL CTX Object Modified after SSL Objects are Created)
The product modifies the SSL context after connection creation has begun.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
666
(Operation on Resource in Wrong Phase of Lifetime) >
605
(Multiple Binds to the Same Port)
When multiple sockets are allowed to bind to the same port, other services on that port may be stolen or spoofed.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
666
(Operation on Resource in Wrong Phase of Lifetime) >
672
(Operation on a Resource after Expiration or Release)
The product uses, accesses, or otherwise operates on a resource after that resource has been expired, released, or revoked.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
666
(Operation on Resource in Wrong Phase of Lifetime) >
672
(Operation on a Resource after Expiration or Release) >
298
(Improper Validation of Certificate Expiration)
A certificate expiration is not validated or is incorrectly validated, so trust may be assigned to certificates that have been abandoned due to age.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
666
(Operation on Resource in Wrong Phase of Lifetime) >
672
(Operation on a Resource after Expiration or Release) >
324
(Use of a Key Past its Expiration Date)
The product uses a cryptographic key or password past its expiration date, which diminishes its safety significantly by increasing the timing window for cracking attacks against that key.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
666
(Operation on Resource in Wrong Phase of Lifetime) >
672
(Operation on a Resource after Expiration or Release) >
613
(Insufficient Session Expiration)
According to WASC, "Insufficient Session Expiration is when a web site permits an attacker to reuse old session credentials or session IDs for authorization."
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
666
(Operation on Resource in Wrong Phase of Lifetime) >
672
(Operation on a Resource after Expiration or Release) >
825
(Expired Pointer Dereference)
The product dereferences a pointer that contains a location for memory that was previously valid, but is no longer valid.
Dangling pointer
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
666
(Operation on Resource in Wrong Phase of Lifetime) >
672
(Operation on a Resource after Expiration or Release) >
825
(Expired Pointer Dereference) >
415
(Double Free)
The product calls free() twice on the same memory address, potentially leading to modification of unexpected memory locations.
Double-free
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
666
(Operation on Resource in Wrong Phase of Lifetime) >
672
(Operation on a Resource after Expiration or Release) >
825
(Expired Pointer Dereference) >
416
(Use After Free)
The product reuses or references memory after it has been freed. At some point afterward, the memory may be allocated again and saved in another pointer, while the original pointer references a location somewhere within the new allocation. Any operations using the original pointer are no longer valid because the memory "belongs" to the code that operates on the new pointer.
Dangling pointer
UAF
Use-After-Free
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
666
(Operation on Resource in Wrong Phase of Lifetime) >
672
(Operation on a Resource after Expiration or Release) >
910
(Use of Expired File Descriptor)
The product uses or accesses a file descriptor after it has been closed.
Stale file descriptor
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
666
(Operation on Resource in Wrong Phase of Lifetime) >
826
(Premature Release of Resource During Expected Lifetime)
The product releases a resource that is still intended to be used by itself or another actor.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
668
(Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere)
The product exposes a resource to the wrong control sphere, providing unintended actors with inappropriate access to the resource.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
668
(Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere) >
1189
(Improper Isolation of Shared Resources on System-on-a-Chip (SoC))
The System-On-a-Chip (SoC) does not properly isolate shared resources between trusted and untrusted agents.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
668
(Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere) >
1189
(Improper Isolation of Shared Resources on System-on-a-Chip (SoC)) >
1303
(Non-Transparent Sharing of Microarchitectural Resources)
Hardware structures shared across execution contexts (e.g., caches and branch predictors) can violate the expected architecture isolation between contexts.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
668
(Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere) >
1282
(Assumed-Immutable Data is Stored in Writable Memory)
Immutable data, such as a first-stage bootloader, device identifiers, and "write-once" configuration settings are stored in writable memory that can be re-programmed or updated in the field.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
668
(Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere) >
1327
(Binding to an Unrestricted IP Address)
The product assigns the address 0.0.0.0 for a database server, a cloud service/instance, or any computing resource that communicates remotely.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
668
(Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere) >
1331
(Improper Isolation of Shared Resources in Network On Chip (NoC))
The Network On Chip (NoC) does not isolate or incorrectly isolates its on-chip-fabric and internal resources such that they are shared between trusted and untrusted agents, creating timing channels.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
668
(Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere) >
134
(Use of Externally-Controlled Format String)
The product uses a function that accepts a format string as an argument, but the format string originates from an external source.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
668
(Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere) >
200
(Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor)
The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information.
Information Disclosure
Information Leak
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
668
(Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere) >
200
(Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor) >
1258
(Exposure of Sensitive System Information Due to Uncleared Debug Information)
The hardware does not fully clear security-sensitive values, such as keys and intermediate values in cryptographic operations, when debug mode is entered.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
668
(Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere) >
200
(Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor) >
1273
(Device Unlock Credential Sharing)
The credentials necessary for unlocking a device are shared across multiple parties and may expose sensitive information.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
668
(Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere) >
200
(Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor) >
1295
(Debug Messages Revealing Unnecessary Information)
The product fails to adequately prevent the revealing of unnecessary and potentially sensitive system information within debugging messages.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
668
(Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere) >
200
(Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor) >
201
(Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data)
The code transmits data to another actor, but a portion of the data includes sensitive information that should not be accessible to that actor.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
668
(Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere) >
200
(Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor) >
201
(Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data) >
598
(Use of GET Request Method With Sensitive Query Strings)
The web application uses the HTTP GET method to process a request and includes sensitive information in the query string of that request.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
668
(Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere) >
200
(Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor) >
203
(Observable Discrepancy)
The product behaves differently or sends different responses under different circumstances in a way that is observable to an unauthorized actor, which exposes security-relevant information about the state of the product, such as whether a particular operation was successful or not.
Side Channel Attack
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
668
(Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere) >
200
(Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor) >
203
(Observable Discrepancy) >
1300
(Improper Protection of Physical Side Channels)
The device does not contain sufficient protection
mechanisms to prevent physical side channels from exposing
sensitive information due to patterns in physically observable
phenomena such as variations in power consumption,
electromagnetic emissions (EME), or acoustic emissions.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
668
(Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere) >
200
(Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor) >
203
(Observable Discrepancy) >
1300
(Improper Protection of Physical Side Channels) >
1255
(Comparison Logic is Vulnerable to Power Side-Channel Attacks)
A device's real time power consumption may be monitored during security token evaluation and the information gleaned may be used to determine the value of the reference token.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
668
(Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere) >
200
(Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor) >
203
(Observable Discrepancy) >
1303
(Non-Transparent Sharing of Microarchitectural Resources)
Hardware structures shared across execution contexts (e.g., caches and branch predictors) can violate the expected architecture isolation between contexts.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
668
(Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere) >
200
(Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor) >
203
(Observable Discrepancy) >
204
(Observable Response Discrepancy)
The product provides different responses to incoming requests in a way that reveals internal state information to an unauthorized actor outside of the intended control sphere.
![]() ![]()
1000
(Research Concepts) >
664
(Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime) >
668
(Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere) >
200
(Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor) >
203
(Observable Discrepancy) >
205
(Observable Behavioral Discrepancy)
The product's behaviors indicate important differences that may be observed by unauthorized actors in a way that reveals (1) its internal state or decision process, or (2) differences from other products with equivalent functionality.
|